p. 2−25
2476-647X
Vol.5/No.18
p. 27−44
2476-647X
Vol.5/No.18
0.05). In spite of this, the average score of normal students in twosubscales (learning as gaining information and learning as remembering andusing information) was significantly higher than talentedstudents (p< 0.05). The average score of talentedstudents in three subscales (learning as personal change,learning as a process that is not limited to time and space and learning as thedevelopment of social competence) was significantly higher thannormalstudents (p< 0.01). And there was no significant differencebetween talented and normal students inlearning as a duty subscale (p> 0.05). Moreover the analysis of data usingMANOVA showed that there was a significant difference between talentedand normal students in study habits (p< 0.01). Also the results revealed thatin the five subscales of study habits the score of talented students wassignificantly higher than normal students (p< 0.01) andthere was no significant difference between talented and normal students inthe three subscales of memory, exams and health (p>0.05). Conclusion:It is recommended that teaching and learningbecome more practical so that the study habitsimprove]]>
p. 45−69
2476-647X
Vol.5/No.18
p. 71−78
2476-647X
Vol.5/No.18
p. 89−99
2476-647X
Vol.5/No.18
p. 102−121
2476-647X
Vol.5/No.18
p. 123−139
2476-647X
Vol.5/No.18
p. 136−155
2476-647X
Vol.5/No.18
p. 157−175
2476-647X
Vol.5/No.18