lida Malekzadeh; Seyedeh Zahra Emadi; zahra naghsh
Abstract
Abstract
This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Schema Therapy on cognitive emotion regulation and Emotional Behavior Regulation in mothers with children with learning disabilities. Based on purpose the research was applied with a semi-experimental design with pre-test, and post-test. The ...
Read More
Abstract
This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Schema Therapy on cognitive emotion regulation and Emotional Behavior Regulation in mothers with children with learning disabilities. Based on purpose the research was applied with a semi-experimental design with pre-test, and post-test. The statistical population of the study was mothers of children with learning disabilities in Tehran in the first six months of 1400. The sample consisted of 30 mothers who were selected as the final sample by purposive sampling method and were randomly divided into two groups of experiments and control (each Group 15 mothers). Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire by Garnefski and Kraaij (2002) and Emotional Behavior Regulation by Garnefski and Kraaij (2019) were used. The experimental group received eight sessions of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and the control group received no therapy. The results of covariance analysis showed that the Perceived Stress and Emotional Behavior Regulation was significantly different in the experimental group (P0.01). So Schema Therapy can be used effectively on cognitive emotion regulation and Emotional Behavior Regulation in mothers with children with learning disabilities.
Keywords: Schema Therapy, Cognitive Emotion Regulation, Emotional Behavior Regulation.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Learning disability is a neurodevelopmental disorder with biological roots that has three characteristics of reading, writing and mathematics. This disorder affects the normal pattern of learning (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Research has shown that parents of children with learning disabilities experience more stress and difficulties in dealing with adverse situations compared to other parents (Gupta, 2007; Suzuki, Kobayashi, Moriyama, Kaja, & Enakagi, 2013). Stress is a general reaction to environmental demands and pressures and is associated with the limitation of people's emotional resources to effectively cope with these demands (Emond, Eyck, Kasmerelli, Robinson, Stillar, & Bledrein, 2016; Anioja & Aniojoti, 2016). Therefore, cognitive and behavioral regulation of emotion is necessary for parents with children with learning disabilities.
Emotion regulation includes adjusting or maintaining experiences and expressing negative and positive emotions and indicates the type of emotion experienced, its occurrence, intensity, duration, and how to express it (Gross, 1998; Gross and Thompson, 2007). In this research, has been noted to two dimensions of cognitive and behavioral regulation of emotion. Cognitive regulation of emotion is the way of cognitive processing of a person when facing unfortunate and stressful events (Garnefski, Ban and Kraij, 2005). The cognitive regulation of emotion can be defined as the cognitive method of managing emotionally stimulated information (Pathoff, Garnevsky, Miklosi, Domingos-Sánchez et al., 2016). People who have the cognitive skills of emotional regulation can reduce or manage negative emotions well, and there is a significant relationship between emotion regulation by reducing self-harm and reducing emotional problems such as symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress. There is (Zofari and Khademi Ashkazari, 2019). Behavioral emotion regulation also evaluates the behavioral strategies that people use to regulate their emotions after stressful or negative events. According to the findings of Garnevsky and Kraich (2019) and Tona (2020), distraction, active coping, and seeking social support are more adaptive methods to cope with stressful events, while avoidance and ignoring are less adaptive strategies.
There are different approaches to helping mothers with children with learning disabilities, and one of these approaches is schema therapy. Schema therapy was founded by Yang, Klosko, and Vishar (2003) and its main goal is to change and improve the initial maladaptive schemas and it is possible to create a healthy schema (Peters et al., 2021). In the approach of schema therapy, the focus is on increased awareness and insight and the understanding of the role of schemas in maintaining problem-causing situations, as well as adjusting the activation and action of schemas (Heuntjen, Rijkboer and Arntz, 2019). Despite conducting numerous researches on the effect of schema therapy, research findings on the effect of schema therapy on mothers with children with learning disabilities are very limited. Therefore, considering the existing gap and the importance of providing effective interventions in the field of cognitive and behavioral regulation of emotion, the present study aims to investigate the effect of schema therapy on the cognitive and behavioral regulation of emotion in mothers with children with learning disabilities.
Research Question
Is schema therapy effective on cognitive and behavioral emotion regulation of mothers with children with learning disabilities?
Literature Review
Hertz and Evans (2021), showed that schema therapy through cognitive, behavioral, interpersonal and experimental interventions has reduced depressive rumination and avoidance behaviors, as well as increased the frequency of positive mood. Dadmo et al. (2018), also showed in research that schema therapy is one of the most important treatments in the treatment of personality disorders, and with schema therapy techniques, emotion regulation can be created in these people.
Methodology
The current research was semi-experimental and the research design was pre-test-post-test with a control group. The statistical population of this study included mothers of children with learning disabilities in Tehran in the first six months of 1400. The research sample included 30 mothers of children with learning disabilities, whose children attended exceptional elementary schools. Among the volunteer mothers, 30 mothers were randomly selected based on the entry and exit criteria. Then, cognitive and behavioral emotion regulation questionnaires were presented to them. Then these 30 mothers were randomly replaced in the experimental and control groups (15 mothers in the experimental group and 15 mothers in the control group). In the next step, the mothers in the experimental group received schema therapy for two months, while the control group did not benefit from this intervention during the research process. After the end of the intervention period, both groups answered the mentioned questionnaires again and the results of the two groups were analyzed with statistical methods of univariate covariance analysis.
Results
The mean and standard deviation of the dependent variables of the research in the pre-test and post-test stages, separated by two experimental and control groups, are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. The mean and standard deviation of the scores of cognitive emotion regulation and Emotional Behavior Regulation in two stages of measurement according to the experimental and control groups
Variable
Stage
experimental
control
Mean
Standard Deviation
Mean
Standard
Deviation
cognitive emotion regulation
Pretest
13.55
3.04
17.08
.902
Posttest
18.22
.183
17.02
.712
Emotional Behavior Regulation
Pretest
11.61
93.3
68.15
1.98
Posttest
15.37
81.3
.2514
2.04
In order to investigate the effectiveness of schema therapy based on cognitive regulation and emotional behavior, univariate covariance analysis was used. Before conducting this test, the assumptions of the normality of the distribution of scores, the homogeneity of the variance of the variables and the equality of the slope of the regression line were checked and all the assumptions were met.
Table 2.The results of covariance analysis to compare the cognitive emotion regulation in the experimental group and the control group
MS
df
F
P-value
Effect size
Pretest
27.37213
1
.34210
0010.
760.
group
40.61689
1
28.309
001.0
840.
error
.5312655
66
total
1174792
69
Table 2 shows the results of covariance analysis to compare the scores of cognitive emotion regulation in the experimental and control groups in the post-test phase. The obtained F value is equal to 309.28 and its significance level is less than 0.001 (p<0.001). Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected and the research hypothesis is confirmed. Based on this and considering the higher average scores of the experimental group in the post-test, it can be concluded that schema therapy has been effective in increasing the cognitive regulation of emotion.
In the following, the effectiveness of schema therapy on the behavioral regulation of emotions has been investigated using the covariance analysis test.
Table 3. The results of covariance analysis to compare the Emotional Behavior Regulation in the experimental group and the control group
MS
df
F
P-value
Effect size
Pretest
27.27413
1
33289.
001.0
74.0
group
40.48689
1
40.404
001.0
.780
error
53/10655
66
total
7479210
69
Table 3 shows the results of the analysis of covariance to compare the emotional regulation scores in the experimental and control groups in the post-test phase. The obtained F value is equal to 404.4 and its significance level is less than 0.001 (p<0.001). Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected and the research hypothesis is confirmed. Based on this and considering the higher average scores of the experimental group in the post-test, it can be concluded that schema therapy has been effective in increasing the behavioral regulation of emotion.
Discussion
The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effectiveness of schema therapy on increasing the cognitive regulation of emotion and the regulation of emotional behavior in mothers with children with learning disabilities. The results showed that schema therapy has a significant effect on increasing the cognitive regulation of emotion and the regulation of emotional behavior in mothers with children with learning disabilities.
Conclusion
The results of this research showed that schema therapy can lead to the reduction of interpersonal problems and emotional instability and emotion regulation by using cognitive therapy. In schema therapy, substituting adaptive management solutions leads to an increase in the regulation of emotions in the individual. In this treatment, by changing incompatible schemas, a person, in facing life events, replaces ineffective coping strategies with adaptive strategies and withdraws his avoidant and negative evaluation. In other words, schema therapy provides conditions for people to use normal and adaptive strategies. Using adaptive strategies increases the mental capacity of people, which in turn improves the regulation of emotions in people.
Acknowledgments
In the end, we would like to express our gratitude to all those who helped the authors in the implementation and compilation of the article.
Mohmmad Ashori; Sogand Ghasemzadeh; Farzaneh Safarpour
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate of the psychometric properties of the Behavioral Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for adolescents and adults for first time in Iran. The present research was descriptive and of survey type. Translation and back-translation processes were used to prepare the Persian ...
Read More
The aim of this study was to investigate of the psychometric properties of the Behavioral Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for adolescents and adults for first time in Iran. The present research was descriptive and of survey type. Translation and back-translation processes were used to prepare the Persian version of the Behavioral Emotion Regulation Questionnaire developed by Kraaij & Garnefski (2019). The statistical population of the present research was adolescents and adults in 2019. The sample included 461 adolescents who were selected through the multistage cluster random sampling method in the provinces of Tehran (Districts 2, 4, 11, and 20) and Isfahan (Isfahan, Shahr-e Reza, and Najaf Abad cities). The viewpoints of nine experts were gathered to assess the questionnaire’s face and content validities. Lawashe method and Waltz and Bausell method were used to calculate the content validity index. Construct validity was analyzed using factor analysis. The reliability of the scale was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest methods. The results of the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed that the five-factor model had a good fitness and its construct validity was confirmed, respectively. The face validity and content validity (CVI=0/84) were confirmed satisfactorily. The content validity indices were .82, .87, .86, .78 and .83 for the subscales of seeking distraction, withdrawal, actively approaching, seeking social support, and ignoring, respectively. The reliability coefficients for the subscales of the Behavioral Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, using Cronbach’s alpha, were found to be .88, .90, .91, .89 and .87, respectively. Additionally, reliability was calculated by the test-retest method and found to be between the range of .59 to .66. The results of the convergent and divergent validities between the Behavioral Emotion Regulation Questionnaire through its simultaneous implementation with the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire and the scale of depression, anxiety and stress were also examined and approved. Therefore, the Behavioral Emotion Regulation Questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool, and it can be used to assess the behavioral emotion regulation of individuals in psychological interventions in the Iranian society.