نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران.

3 استاد گروه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران.

10.22054/jpe.2024.76940.2639

چکیده

شرایط زمینه­ای در هر کشور ایجاب می­کند که تاریخچه منحصربه­فردی از آموزش­های ویژه داشته باشند و این امر منجر به سیستم­های آموزشی و خدمات متفاوت برای دانش­آموزان با نیازهای ویژه شده است. پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تطبیقی قانون آموزش دانش­آموزان با نیازهای ویژه در آمریکا و ایران بود که با تأکید بر حیطه ناتوانی­های یادگیری و رویه اجرای آن، نقاط قوت و ضعف آن را تشریح نمود. روش مورد استفاده در این پژوهش از نوع تحلیل اسنادی بود که جمع­آوری اطلاعات مورد نیاز از طریق جستجوی گسترده در پایگاه­های علمی معتبر و گزارش­ها و اسناد دولتی منتشرشده، انجام گرفت. قوانین آموزش ویژه در آمریکا (تا سال 2022 م) و ایران (تا سال 1402 ش) با تطبیق و مقایسه روند تغییرات و چگونگی اجرای آن در زمینه ناتوانی­های یادگیری موردتوجه بود. وجود برنامه­های آموزش فردی، ضمانت اجرایی، حق تصمیم­گیری والدین و دانش­آموزان در امور آموزشی از برجستگی­های قانون آموزش ویژه در آمریکا است ولی به توسعه طرح­های پژوهشی و انجام پژوهش­های علمی در قانون ایران تأکید بیشتری شده است. در بررسی رویه اجرایی قوانین و توجه به دانش­آموزان دارای ناتوانی­های یادگیری، در ایران فقط حمایت­ها در دوره ابتدایی صورت می­گیرد درحالی‌که در آمریکا تا پایان تحصیلات دانشگاهی این حمایت­ها وجود دارد. همچنین شناسایی و ارزیابی دانش­آموزان دارای معلولیت نیز در آمریکا با دقت بیشتری انجام می­شود. دستیابی به اهداف قانون حقوق افراد با نیازهای ویژه، نه‌تنها نیازمند تکمیل و تصویب قانون است، بلکه درگرو اجرای صحیح قوانین و اصلاح ساختارها نیز هست.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Comparative Study of Education Laws and their Implementation for Students with Special Needs in the United States and Iran: With an Emphasis on Learning Disabilities

نویسندگان [English]

  • Razieh Jamaati Ardakani 1
  • Morteza Monadi 2
  • اخوان تفتی Akhavan Tafti 3

1 PhD student in Educational Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Abstract
The background conditions in each country require that they have a unique history of special education, which has led to different educational systems and services for students with special needs. This study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of the education laws for students with special needs in the United States and Iran, focusing on the field of learning disabilities and their implementation procedures, and examining their strengths and weaknesses. The research employed a document analysis method, gathering necessary information through extensive search in reputable scientific databases, reports, and published government documents. The special education laws in the United States (up to 2022) and Iran (up to 2023) were compared and analyzed in terms of the changes over time and the implementation processes concerning learning disabilities. Prominent features of the U.S. special education law include individualized education programs, enforcement guarantees, and parental and student decision-making rights in educational matters. However, there is greater emphasis on research project development and scientific investigations in Iranian law. Regarding the implementation procedures and attention to students with learning disabilities, in Iran, support is mainly provided during the early years of education, whereas in the United States, such support continues until the completion of higher education. Additionally, the evaluation of students with disabilities are carried out with greater precision in the United States. Achieving the goals of the law on the rights of individuals with special needs requires not only the completion and approval of legislation but also proper implementation of the laws and structural reforms.
Keywords: Comparative Study, Education Law for Children with Special Needs in Iran and the United States, Implementation Procedures, Learning Disabilities.
 
 
Extended Abstract

Introduction

The contextual conditions in each country require that they have a unique history of special education. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is a part of the education rule in the US that has approved the legal process to receive special services for children. In Iran, the law on the education of exceptional children was approved in 1991 by the parliament. Given that learning disabilities is a global issue, it seems necessary to consider it because these children have natural intelligence, but they have severe problems in learning language, reading, writing or solving math problems (Afrozeh et al., 2022) and if diagnosis and reforms are not performed on time, these students will have more problems in higher courses (Shayan, Akhavan Tafti and Ashayeri, 2010). The significance of the study indicates that a few researches have compared the law of education of children with special needs and its implementation procedure in Iran and the US. In this research, the United States has been selected due to its history and progress about children with special needs.
Research Question
Is the low progress of Iran in the fields related to students with special needs, is due to defects in the laws or is it related to the executive procedure in this country?

Literature Review

Historically, special education in the US began in the early 1800s with the efforts of Howe and Gallaudet and has developed considerably since then (Friend, 2013). It is estimated that about 15% of children in the US (Pew Research Center, 2023) have disabilities that are supported by the government under IDEA. Key requirements in IDEA are:
- Free and suitable public education
- Identification and evaluation
- Individual training program
- Minimum environmental restrictions
- Guarantees related to the proceedings
- Participation of parents and students and joint decision-making (Apling and Jones, 2008).
In 1921, the first activities in the field of education of children with special needs started in Iran. But officially in 1991 with the establishment of exceptional education, the institutions started their activities. The goals of the special education organization include:
1) Design the education and rehabilitation system as the mental and physical disabilities of exceptional children are compensated.
2) Continuous reform of exceptional education according to the new methods of education around the world.
3) Considering different groups of exceptional students at different levels.
4) Helping to prevent the occurrence of physical and mental disabilities (Education and Development Organization Charter, 1991).

Methodology

One of the research method types is document analysis and review. The use of documentary research methods includes exploring documents that are related to the subject under study (Creswell, 2012). Documents about a specific subject are one of the data collection methods in the qualitative method (Monadi, 2006). In this research, special education laws in America are related to 1954 until now and in Iran are related to 1920 until now. Descriptive-comparative method is another methodology that was used in this research to adapt and compare the process of changes in special education rules in Iran and America and based on its implementation procedure, it focused on its strengths and weaknesses. Most of the data has been obtained by reviewing the literature and using scientific databases, authentic domestic and foreign magazines and books, and published government reports and documents.

Results

The goal of the researcher regarding the mentioned comparative study is to identify the possible defects of the current laws of Iran and improve their efficiency. The comparative analysis of current laws and procedures in both educational systems is as follows:
Legal commonality:
- Continuous assessment of the work of teachers and trainers
- Implementation of identification and selection plans
- Helping to avoid the occurrence of physical and mental disabilities
- Attention to education in all courses
Strengths of IDEA:
- Considering the details and stages of the educational system, the individual education program, the existence of guarantees related to the legal process, the participation of parents and students in educational affairs and having the decision right, the existence of related services and attention to the issue of student transfer.
The strengths of the law on the education of exceptional children in Iran:
- Paying attention to the development of research projects and performing scientific research, emphasizing the preparation of textbooks and teaching aids.
Executive procedure in the field of learning disabilities:
All the following items exist in the US, but they have not been taken into consideration in Iran, and this indicates the difference in the implementation process of the two countries:
- Provide services in post-primary courses
- Existence of learning disability centers in universities
- The existence of universities for students with learning disabilities
- Considering the monitoring and identification of students with special needs in terms of quantity and quality

Discussion

 Considering the large number of students with special needs, namely learning disabilities, it is expected that there is significant progress and research in this field. They need special support and intervention besides traditional classroom experiences to be successful in school. Paying attention to individual student needs, low student-to-teacher ratio, more opportunities for personal counseling, and the use of individual and diverse educational strategies are among the programs that the educational system in America has taken into consideration (Velog et al., 1989). Therefore, it is important to have effective prevention, monitoring and treatment systems with the participation of specialists from different fields (Grigorenko et al., 2020).

Conclusion

Achieving the goals of the law on the rights of individuals with special needs, not only requires the completion and approval of the law, but also depends on the correct implementation of the laws and the reform of the structures so that it works together with the environmental issues, adaptation of programs and educational management, because ​ only approving the law without executive guarantee does not solve the problem of disabled people.
Acknowledgments
This paper is taken from a doctoral thesis and the authors express their gratitude to all those who collaborated in this research.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Comparative Study
  • Education Law for Children with Special Needs in Iran and the United States
  • Implementation Procedures
  • Learning Disabilities.  
منابع
اتحاد، زهرا؛ سلیمان­پور، جواد و خلخالی، علی. (1400). ارائه مدل مدیریت آموزشی برای مدارس با نیازهای ویژه بر اساس تجربه­زیسته مدیران. فصلنامه مدیریت مدرسه، 9(1)، 230-205.
اخوان تفتی، مهناز. (1395). قانون حمایت از افراد با ناتوانی: مروری بر چالش‌ها و ناهمانندی­ها در اجرا و دستاوردهای آن در چند کشور، پژوهش در علوم توان‌بخشی، 12(3). 184-172.
اخوان تفتی، مهناز. (1397). نگاهی نو به مشکلات کهنه اختلال­های یادگیری، تهران: سازمان جهاد دانشگاهی.
افروزه، الهام؛ امرائی، کورش؛ حسنزاده، سعید؛ عزیزی، محمدپارسا. (1401). تأثیر برنامه آموزش ادراک دیداری-شنیداری بر مهارت روان­خوانی و درک مطلب دانش­آموزان نارساخوان، روانشناسی افراد استثنایی، 12(45)، 191-171.
امیدوار، احمد. (1379). سیر تاریخی آموزش‌وپرورش استثنایی در ایران. تهران: نشر ثارالله.
اورکی، محمد؛ زارع، حسین و عطار قصبه، زهرا. (1396). تأثیر توان‌بخشی شناختی بر حافظه کاری و پیشرفت تحصیلی کودکان با اختلال ریاضی، دوفصلنامه شناخت اجتماعی، 6(2)، 196-181.
بسته­های تحولی و برنامه­های سازمان آموزش‌وپرورش با نیازهای ویژه سال 1399، تحت نظارت و مدیریت سید جواد حسینی.
بهراد، بهنام. (1384). فراتحلیل شیوع ناتوانی­های یادگیری در دانش­آموزان ابتدایی ایران، فصلنامه پژوهش در حیطه کودکان با نیازهای ویژه، 5(4)، 436-417.
تبریزی، مصطفی. (1385). درمان اختلالات دیکته­نویسی، تهران: نشر فراروان.
تبریزی، مصطفی؛ تبریزی، علیرضا و تبریزی، نرگس. (1402). درمان اختلالات خواندن، تهران: نشر فراروان.
سازمان آموزش‌وپرورش استثنایی. (1402)، اساسنامه سازمان آموزش‌وپرورش استثنایی مصوب مجلس شورای اسلامی.
سازمان آموزش‌وپرورش استثنایی، اساسنامه. (1370). مصوب 29/05/1370 کمیسیون آموزش‌وپرورش مجلس شورای اسلامی.
شایان، نسرم، اخوان تفتی، مهناز و عشایری، حسن. (1389). تأثیر روش ترمیمی دیویس بر بهبود نارساخوانی بزرگ‌سالان، مطالعات روانشناسی تربیتی، 12(7)، 46-23.
شریعتی، هوشنگ. (1387). ناتوانی­های یادگیری، اختلال­های یادگیری، تعلیم و تربیت استثنایی، 6(83)، 49-60.
قاسمی، اعظم. (1398). آسیب­شناسی آموزش‌وپرورش با نیازهای ویژه، قم: انتشارات توانمندان.
مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی، 1402.
معدن­دار آرانی، عباس. (1394). مطالعات تطبیقی در آموزش‌وپرورش: کاربست روش­های جدید تحقیق، فصلنامه خانواده و پژوهش، 12(2)، 89-69.
منادی، مرتضی. (1385). روش کیفی در علوم اجتماعی و علوم رفتاری، فصلنامه حوزه و دانشگاه، پژوهشکده حوزه و دانشگاه، 12(47)، 93-80.
یزدانپور، سمیه. (1389). بررسی تطبیقی سیاست­ها، اهداف و تشکیلات آموزش‌وپرورش با نیازهای ویژه در کشورهای آمریکا، هند و ایران، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی‌ارشد علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
 
References
Agrawal, J., Barrio, B. L., Kressler B., Hsiao, Y. J. & Shankland, R. K. (2019). International policies, identification, and services for students with learning disabilities: An exploration across 10 countries. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 17, 95-114.
Apling, R., & Jones, N. (2008). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): Overview and Selected Issues. CRS Report for Congress (RS22590). Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Boyle, C. A., Boulet, S., Schieve, L. A. et al. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997-2008, Pediatrics, 1034-1042.
Brady, R. (2007). American Physical Therapy Association, Practice Committee of the Section on Pediatrics. Factsheet-Assistive Technology and the Individualized Education Program. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association.
Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making Academia More Accessible, Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82-90.
Bulat, J., Hayes, A., Macon, W., Ticha, R., & Abery, B. (2015). School and classroom disabilities inclusion guide for low – and middle- income countries. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Collecting qualitative data. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Fourth ed. Boston: Pearson, 204, 35.
Damer, L. K. (2001). Inclusion and the law, Music Education Journal, 87(4), 19-22.
Devore, C. D., & Wheeler, L. S. (2013). American of Pediatrics, Council on School Health. Role of the school physician. Pediatrics. 131(1): 178-182.
Fahad A. Alnaim. (2016). History of Learning Disabilities: Reflection on the Development of the Concept and Assessment. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 16(A3), 33-36.
Friend, M. (2013). Special education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Gay, G. (2002). Culturally responsive teaching in special education for ethnically diverse students: Setting the stage. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15, 613- 629.
Ghonchepour, M., & Pakzad Moghaddam, M. (2018). The role of intelligence in learning English as a foreign language, Research in English Language Pedagogy, 6(1): 25-38.
Grigorenko, E. L., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L.S., Wanger, R. K., Willcutt, E. G., & Fletcher, J. M. (2020). Understanding, educating, and supporting children with specific learning disabilities: 50 years of science and practice. American Psychologist, 75(1), 37-51.
Hallahan D. P. & Mercer, C. D. (2001). Learning disabilities: Historical perspectives. Special Education Programs: Washington, D.C. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED458756.
Hallahan, D. P., & Mercer, C. D. (2002). Learning disabilities: Historical perspectives. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson. & D. P. Hallahan (Eds), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 1-65). Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum.
Hammill, D. D. (1993). A brief look at the learning disabilities movement in the United States. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 295-310.
Heiman, T., & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2020). Social-emotional profile of children with and without learning disabilities: The relationships with perceived loneliness, self-efficacy and well-being, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20): 7358.
Hill, D. A., & Sukbunpant, s. (2013). The comparison of special education between Thailand and the United States: Inclusion and support for children with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Special Education, 28(1), 120-134.
Hulett, Kurt E. (2009). Legal Aspects of Special Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc., ISBN 0131173464 OCLC 815827554.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 2004, Pub L No. 108-446.
Kim, E., Zhang, J., & Sun, X. (2019). Comparison of Special Education in the United States, Korea and China. International Journal of Special Education, 33(4), 796-814.
Kritzer, J. B. (2014). A four country comparison: Special education in the United States, China, India and Thailand. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 4(23), 3370-3382.
Landmark.edu/center-for-neurodiversity
LDonline.org/ld-topics/college-prep/success-college-adults-learning-disabilities
Marini, I., Graf, N. M., & Millington, M. J. (2017). Psychosocial aspects of disability: Insider perspectives and strategies for counselors, Springer Publishing Company, 2nd Edition.
Meyer, G., & Patton, J. (2001). On the nexus of race, disability, and overrepresentation: What do we know? Where do we go? On point…Brief discussions of critical issues in urban education. Newton, National Institute for Urban School Improvement.
Mezzanotte, C. (2022). The social and economic rationale of inclusive education: An overview of the outcomes in education for diverse groups of students, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 263, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Miller, B., Vaughn, S., & Freund, L. (2014). Learning disabilities research studies: Findings from NICHD funded projects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(3), 225-231.
National Center for Learning Disabilities, Washington, DC 20005, https://www.ncld.org/get-involved/learn-the-law/idia/
National Center Learning Disabilities, (2006). IDEA Parent Guide, https://www.ncld.org/wp-content/uplouds/2014/11/IDEA-parent-Guide.pdf
National library of medicine. (2015). Committee to evaluate the supplemental security income disability program for children with mental disorders. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US).
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education, (2004), Services and Supports for Secondary School Student with Disabilities.
Opoku, M. P. (2021). Exploring the intentions of school leaders towards implementing inclusive education in secondary schools in Ghana, International Journal of Leadership in education, Published online: 16 Feb 2021, 1-22.
Peterson, R. L., Boada, R., McGrath, L. M., Willcutt, E. G., Olson, R. K., & Pennington, B. F. (2017). Cognitive prediction of reading, math, and attention: Shared and unique influences. Journal of learning disabilities, 50(4), 408-421.
Retrieved from sites.ed.gov/idea/IDEA-history.
Richardson, S. O. (1992). Historical perspectives on dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 40-47.
Thirty-five Years of Progress in Education Children with Disabilities Through IDEA -Pg 10. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. US Department of Education. April 27, 2016. Archived from the original on November 26, 2012.
Vaughn, J. (2003). Disabled rights: American policy and the fight for equality. Washington, D.C>, Georgetown University Press.
Wehlage, G. G., Rutter, R. A., Smith, G. A., Lesko, N., & Fernandez, R. R. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. New York: Falmer press.
Wende, M.C. van der (2003). Globalization and access to higher education, Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(2), pp. 193-206.
Wieser, M. (2020). The concept of crisis in the history of western psychology. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yell, M. (2012). The law and special education (4th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Zigmond, N. (1990). Rethinking secondary school programs for students with learning disabilities. Focus Except child, 23: 1-22.