sefallah aghajani; matine ebadi; Sanaz eyni
Abstract
Students with specific learning disorder have adaptation problems due to lack of favorable social relationships and numerous academic problems. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of predicting social adjustment based on metacognitive beliefs, alexithymia and empathy in students with ...
Read More
Students with specific learning disorder have adaptation problems due to lack of favorable social relationships and numerous academic problems. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of predicting social adjustment based on metacognitive beliefs, alexithymia and empathy in students with special learning disabilities. In this descriptive and correlational study, 116 student were selected as a purposeful sample from all male and female students aged 10 to 14 years with specific learning disorder in Tabriz in 2019- 2020. Bell Social Adjustment Questionnaire, Wells Metacognitive Beliefs Questionnaire, Toronto Alexithymia Scale and Jolliffe & Farrington Empathy Scale were used to collect data. Data were analyzed by Pearson test and regression analysis. The results showed that social adjustment of students with specific learning disabilities had a positive and significant relationship and empathy and with metacognitive beliefs and alexithymia had a negative and significant relationship (p> 0.01). Metacognitive beliefs, alexithymia and empathy predicted 58% of the variance of social adjustment scores in students with specific learning disabilities (P <0.01). Considering the adverse consequences of learning disability and its widespread effects on the child's individual and social life, it is suggested that programs be implemented to promote appropriate metacognitive emotions and beliefs and to develop empathy among students with learning disabilities.
Zeinab Abedi Daryooni; La'ya Bashash
Volume 3, Issue 10 , March 2013, , Pages 93-112
Abstract
Various researches have consistently shown thatpeople with mental disabilities have difficulties in recognizing, describingand responding to the emotional states of others. The aim of this research isto compare empathy dimensions of two groups of students with and withoutintellectual disabilities. The ...
Read More
Various researches have consistently shown thatpeople with mental disabilities have difficulties in recognizing, describingand responding to the emotional states of others. The aim of this research isto compare empathy dimensions of two groups of students with and withoutintellectual disabilities. The statistical population of this research consistsof all students with mild intellectual disability and typically developingstudents of elementary schools of Shiraz in the academic year of 2010-2011. 733students, 339 with mild intellectual disabilities and 393 normal students, agedbetween 7 and 11 years old are selected as sample from elementary schools ofShiraz. The instrument of the study is the Griffith Empathy Measure (Dadds& et al, 2008). The scale has three dimensions; affectional, cognitive andgeneral. Parents of the sample students are asked to complete the questionnaire.The reliability of the scale is studied by test-retest reliability (affectioal α=.66, cognitive α= .57, and general α= .71). The validity is confirmed byinternal consistency. The study achieved the following results: 1) there is nosignificant difference between the two groups in the affectional empathydimension. In contrast, results indicate significant difference in thecognitive and general dimensions, because the typically developing students hadhigher scores in the cognitive and general dimensions than students withintellectual disabilities. 2) In the affectional dimension, females achievedhigher scores than males. 3) In the general empathy dimension, females withoutdisability had higher scores than males with intellectual disability