Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Educational Psychology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Rudehen Branch, Islamic Azad Uninersity, Rudehen, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Professor, Department of Psychology, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The present study was a cross-sectional and applied research comparing the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation and social emotional skills on the development of theory of mind in autistic children. The quasi-experimental method was pre-test and post-test with control group. From 45 students introduced to a school and MITA in (2019-2020) by completing a questionnaire of ASSQ in a community of 30 people in the sample group of 30 people was replaced by stratified random sampling in two training groups and one control group. The first group was trained with intelligent facial cognitive rehabilitation program and the second group was trained with emotional and social skills. The third group did not receive training. Statistical results of MANCOVA and Scheffe post hoc test showed that the level of mind theory in children with autism increased after applying only cognitive rehabilitation and both groups had higher mean levels of total mind theory than the control group. Experimental groups 1 had higher mean than level 1 and 2 and total mind theory than the control group and the difference between the means was significant at the level of 0.05. The second experimental group had a higher mean at level 3 than the control group and the difference in means was significant at the level of 0.05. It can be concluded that cognitive rehabilitation is a suitable intervention method for educators and therapists of autistic children to promote the theory of mind.

Keywords

References
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical Manual of Mental disorders- V (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Brewer, N., Young, R. L. & Barnett, E. (2017). Measuring Theory of Mind in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1-15.
CASEL-Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning (2003). Safe and sound: An educational leader’s guide to evidence based social and emotional learning (SEL) Program. Chicago, IL:Author.
Didebani, n., Allen,T., Kandalaft,. M., Krawczyk, D., & Chapman,S. (2016). Virtual reality social cognition training for vchildren with high functioning autism. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 703-711.
Durlak, J. A. Weissberg, R.P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, and R.D. & Schellinger, k. b. (2011): Thent impact of enhancing Student’s social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school- based universal interventions. In: Child Development, 82,405-432.
Ehlers S, Gillberg C, (1993). Epidemilogy of Asperger syndrome A total population study, Journal of Child Psychology and psychiatry, 34, 1372-1350
Flavell, J. H. (1977). The development of knowledge about visual perception. Nebr. Symp. Motiv. 25, 43–76.
Jon Baio (2018). Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years-Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 S.
Pearson, Amy; Ropear, Danielle; Hamilton, Antonia F.de C. (2013). (A review of visual perspective taking in autism specrum disorder. Publisher, frontiers in HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00652
Sohlberg M M, Mateer C. A. (2001). Cognitive rehabilitation: an integrative neuropsychological approach. Guilford Press: New York.
Stevens, J. P., (1996). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the social sciences (Fifth Edition). University of Cincinnati
Weissberg. R. P, Goren. P.,Domitrovich, c., Dusenbury. L. (2013).CASEL GUIDE. Preschool and Elementary school Edition.