نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه روان‌شناسی و آموزش کودکان استثنایی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

2 استاد گروه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

چکیده

نارسایی‌های یادگیری ویژه شامل اختلالی عصب-تحولی است که در سال‌های اخیر از منظر روان‌شناسی مثبت موردتوجه قرار گرفته است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر ترسیم نقشه مفهومی سازه‌های روان‌شناسی مثبت محور در حوزه نارسایی‌های یادگیری ویژه بود. طرح پژوهش از نوع مطالعه مروری نظام‌مند بود. از طریق الگوی پریسما یافته‌های پژوهشی مرتبط با متغیرهای سازه‌های روان‌شناسی مثبت محور در حوزه نارسایی‌های یادگیری ویژه موردبررسی قرار گرفت. در این راستا، با استفاده از کلیدواژه‌های تخصصی سازه‌های روان‌شناسی مثبت و نارسایی‌های یادگیری ویژه (شامل اختلال خواندن، اختلال نوشتن، اختلال ریاضی)، به جستجو در پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی ازجمله Pubmed, Eric, Scopus, Sid, Irandoc,Noormags Ebsco,Science Direct,ProQuest, Springer پرداخته شد و مقالات و اطلاعات مرتبط با عنوان پژوهش حاضر، مورد واکاوی قرار گرفت. یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که سازه‌های روان‌شناسی مثبت شامل متغیرهای بهزیستی روانی، تاب‌آوری، خوش‌بینی، سلامت روان، کیفیت زندگی، شادکامی، امید، رضایت از زندگی، سپاسگزاری و معنویت تأثیرگذارترین کلمات کلیدی در شبکه هم‌رخدادی هستند و پژوهش‌های روان‌شناسی مثبت محور بر سازه‌های ذکرشده تأکید دارند. شواهد پژوهشی بیانگر این است که تقویت و بهبود سازه‌های روان‌شناسی مثبت می‌تواند برای دانش‌آموزان با نارسایی‌های یادگیری ویژه بسیار مفید واقع شود. این مطالعه‌ نشان‌دهنده‌ی اهمیت سازه‌های روان‌شناسی مثبت در حوزه‌ی اختلالات یادگیری ویژه بود، لذا برای دستیابی به نتایج مطلوب در حوزه نارسایی‌های یادگیری ویژه ادغام فعالیت‌های شواهدمحور و پژوهشی با فعالیت‌های بالینی و مداخله‌ای پیشنهاد می‌گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Positive Psychology Constructs in Specific Learning Disorder: A Systematic Review Study

نویسندگان [English]

  • shahrooz nemati 1
  • rahim badri 1
  • shahram ,vahedi 2
  • Niloufar Broumandzadeh 3

1 Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

3 Ph.D. Student in Educational Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

چکیده [English]

Specific learning disability is neurodevelopmental disorder that was considered from positive psychology approach in recent years. The aim of the current research was to draw concept map of positive psychology constructs in specific learning disability. The research design was a systematic review study. Through the PRISMA model, research findings related to the variables of positive psychology constructs in specific learning disability will be examined. In the same vein a systematic review study method with use of positive psychology key words and specific learning disability, dyslexia, dysgraphia, dyscalculia, positive thinking, optimistic, resilience, hope, Gratitude, wellbeing, positive relationships, strengths, satisfaction, hardiness, mindfulness, positive emotion from web the Data (Pubmed, Eric, Scopus, Sid, Irandoc,Noormags, Ebsco,Science Direct,Pro Quest, Springer), was conduct in accordance with research objectives to executed current study. The findings of this study showed that positive psychology constructs include psychological well-being, resilience, optimistic, mental health, quality of life, Happiness, hope, life Satisfaction, gratitude and spirituality are most effective key words in co-occurrence network and positive psychology projects have emphasized on mentioned constructs. Research evidence expressive that reinforcement and recovery of positive psychology constructs can be useful for student with specific learning disability. This study was indicating important of positive psychology constructs in specific learning disability, thus recommend for achieving better result in specific learning disability merge the evidence based and research activities with clinical and treatment activities.
Keywords: Positive Psychology Constructs, Specific Learning Disorder, Systematic Review Study
 
 
 
Extended Abstract

Introduction

Specific learning disabilities are lifelong neurodevelopmental conditions that present developmental challenges in different areas, including disorders in reading, writing, and mathematics. The processes of intervention and education for students with specific learning disabilities are influenced by shifts in prevailing psychological paradigms. Notably, one of the most important and effective paradigms in the field of psychological intervention and research is positive psychology. Positive psychology emphasizes that individuals with learning disabilities possess unique strengths and competencies that should be recognized, understood, and strengthened through supportive programs. Positive psychology helps students with learning disabilities focus on their abilities rather than their limitations, and this shift in focus leads to positive long-term outcomes. These students face numerous challenges, and positive psychology frameworks can help them manage these difficulties and achieve positive results. Therefore, this article introduces and examines evidence-based findings on the application of positive psychology in the field of specific learning disabilities, clarifying its theoretical foundations and implementation methods. A systematic review and analysis of previous experimental research on positive psychology in the context of specific learning disabilities contributes theoretically to the refinement and expansion of related theoretical perspectives. Furthermore, synthesizing existing research evidence provides practical clinical and research directions for future interventions for researchers and practitioners.

Literature Review

Positive psychology constructs have a rich history in the field of disability studies, and research evidence supports the effectiveness of applying positive psychology concepts to various outcomes in specific learning disabilities. These outcomes include self-concept (Ghazi Abed, 2017); quality of life and self-determination (Wehmeyer, 2021); mindfulness (Wehmeyer, 2021; Dehghani, 2022; Badri Gargari et al., 2019; Nemati et al., 2018); well-being (Tiwari & Upadhyay, 2020); strengths and positive characteristics (Wehmeyer, 2021); positive thinking, self-talk, and optimism (Feeney, 2019; Ghazi Abed, 2017; Kadampour et al., 2021); resilience (Georgiadi, 2020; Ofiesh & Mather, 2013; Naemi & Faeghi, 2018); empathy (Eyuboglu et al., 2018); hope (Dehghani et al., 2022); and coping strategies (Wehmeyer, 2021).

Method

The present study is a systematic review that examines relevant research findings using the PRISMA model and bibliometric analysis. Searches were conducted across various databases using specialized keywords related to positive psychology constructs and specific learning disabilities. Keywords included terms such as specific learning disability, reading disorder, writing disorder, math disorder, gratitude, resilience, empathy, forgiveness, positive thinking, optimism, psychological well-being, positive relationships, strengths, happiness, psychological toughness, positive emotions, satisfaction, and mindfulness. The search period covered publications from 1985 to 2022.

Result

The initial search identified 2,178 papers. Given the high volume of results, a bibliometric analysis of keyword co-occurrence was applied to refine the search, resulting in 1,847 papers. The retrieved data were analyzed using VOSviewer software, and a co-occurrence network of the authors' keywords was generated. This network contained 214 nodes, 2,193 links, and 11 clusters where keywords co-occurred at least five times. The most relevant keywords included depression, psychological well-being, mental health, optimism, hope, and resilience.
Figure 1. Co-occurrence network of keywords by authors
 
To identify the most influential keywords, the network was exported in GML format and imported into Gephi software for network analysis. Table 1 presents the most influential keywords within the co-occurrence network.
Table 1. The most influential keywords in the co-occurrence network




Positive psychology


2


9271.2016


176


0.1






Welfare


7


8271.2016


108


735907.0




Resilience


1


1756.2017


107


72526.0




Depression


1


15942.2016


80


603565.0




Optimism


1


15.2015


75


570486.0




Mental health


5


6667.2017


69


512835.0




Quality of life


1


7458.2015


68


506579.0




Happiness


7


2157.2016


62


490891.0




Hope


3


5.2015


61


490889.0




Satisfaction with life


6


8537.2015


54


469145.0




Psychological well-being


9


24.2016


52


4459.0




Gratitude


2


2059.2017


54


434805.0




Spirituality


2


9429.2014


46


412952.0




To identify research fields, a citation network was created from references cited at least five times. The resulting network consists of 77 nodes, 865 edges, and 7 clusters, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Citation network of cited references
 
 To identify the most influential documents, the network graph was exported in GML format and imported into Gephi. After calculating the average degree and eigenvector centrality, the documents were ranked, and the top 10 influential documents are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Documents with the highest eigenvector centrality in the mentioned reference network




Authors


Title


Degree


Eigenvector
centrality






Seligman and
Sesikzentmihalya (2014)


Introduction an positive psychology


151


780412.0
 




Seligman et al. (2005)


Positive Psychology Progress: Empirical Validation of Interventions


75


628162.0




Scheier and Carver (1985)


Optimism, Coping, and Health


70


35671.0




Fredikson (2001)


The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology


94


049531.0




Sin and Limborski (2009)


Enhancing Well-being and Alleviating Depressive Symptoms with Positive Psychology Interventions


11


022558.0




Lotans et al. (2007)


The Importance Of Positive Psychology


32


021444.0




Wang and Gan (2020)


Exploring the Demotivational Factors of Learning English Based on Positive Psychology


5


006168.0




Bollier et al (2013)


Positive Psychology Interventions: A Meta-Analysis


21


0.0




McIntyre et al. (2019)


Setting an Agenda for Positive Psychology:


3


0.0




Wang et al. (2021)


Research and Experience of Positive Psychology in Foreign/Second Language Learning and Education


1


0.0





Discuss

In the present research, first the keywords were searched in the relevant databases. Articles that were in harmony with the keywords of the research were selected. After identifying the articles, a number of articles were removed due to not reporting the information properly also some of them were left out of the research process due to the lack of subject compatibility after reviewing the title and abstract. Finally, after a detailed review of the full text of the articles, 25 articles were selected as the final research community in terms of the relevance of the research topic. The content of these domestic and foreign articles was related to positive psychology constructs in the field of special learning disabilities, and they were also the main goal of the present study.

Conclusion

The present study drew a conceptual map of positive psychology constructs in the field of special learning disabilities. Research evidence supports the usefulness of using positive psychology constructs in the field of special learning disabilities. This usefulness is observable in most researches including Wehmeyer, 2021; Ghadampour et al, 2021; Wright, 2020; Georgiadi, 2020; Goldberg, 2020; Tiwari Upadhyay, 2020; Feeney, 2019; Ayuboglu et al, 2018; Ghazi Abed, 2017; Ofish & Mother, 2013; Dehghani et al., 1401; Dehghani et al., 1400; Badri Gregari et al., 2019; Nemati et al., 2018; Naimi and Faeghi, 2017. Positive psychology is the study of flourishing, optimal functioning and well-being of human being. For many people, disability and learning disorder is considered as a defect or disease that is permanent and needs to be treated, but all members of society should understand that people suffering from special learning disabilities also have strengths and potentials that should be nurtured and they can also experience optimal human performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Positive Psychology Constructs
  • Specific Learning Disorder
  • Systematic Review Study
منابع
بدری گرگری، ر.، نعمتی، ش.، و خانی صلوات، ز. (1399). اثربخشی آموزش ذهن‌آگاهی بر ظرفیت حافظه کاری دانش‌آموزان دارای اختلال یادگیری خاص. مجله ناتوانی‌های یادگیری، 10(1)، صفحات 47-32.
دهقانی، ی.، مجدیان، ن.، افشین، ع.، و فرازجا، م. (1400). اثربخشی آموزش ذهن‌آگاهی بر برنامه‌ریزی و انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی دانش‌آموزان مبتلا به اختلال یادگیری. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، 17(60)، 135-111.
دهقانی، ی.، اسماعیلی، خ.، و افشین، ع. (1401). اثربخشی آموزش امید بر درگیری تحصیلی، فرسودگی تحصیلی و خوش‌بینی تحصیلی در دانش‌آموزان دچار اختلال یادگیری. فصلنامه کودکان استثنایی، 22(2)، 36-19.
سعدی‌پور، ا.، میرزایی فندخت، ا.، سلم‌آبادی، م.، و صف آراء، م. (1397). مقایسه سرسختی روان‌شناختی و نشاط ذهنی در دانش‌آموزان با اختلال یادگیری خاص و عادی. مجله مطالعات ناتوانی، (8)80، 7-1.
مرتضوی امامی، ع.ا.، احقر، ق.، پیرانی، ذ.، حیدری، ح.، و حمیدی‌پور، ر. (1397). تأثیر آموزش روان‌شناسی مثبت‌نگر بر خودکارآمدی و سرسختی روان‌شناختی دانش آموزان دختر. فصلنامه خانواده و پژوهش، 43، 82-67.
ناعمی، ع.م.، و فائقی، ز.ه. (1397). تأثیر روش مداخله‌ی مبتنی بر روان‌شناسی مثبت‌گرا بر خودبخشایشگری و تاب‌آوری مادران کودکان دارای ناتوانی یادگیری. فصلنامه کودکان استثنایی، 18(2)، 38-23.
نعمتی، ش.، بدری، ر.، و خانی صلوات، ز. (1398). تأثیر ذهن‌آگاهی بر توانایی توجه و درک مطلب دانش آموزان دارای اختلال یادگیری ویژه با آسیب خواندن. پژوهش‌های علوم شناختی و رفتاری، (1)9، 104-91.
ویسمه، م.، استکی، م.، و میرزاخانی، ن. (1402). مقایسه‌ی اثربخشی آموزش کارکردهای اجرایی مبتنی بر بازی‌های رایانه‌ای و یکپارچگی حسی بر علائم نارساخوانی دانش‌آموزان. روان‌شناسی افراد استثنایی، (49)13، 172-146.
References
Alves, D., Sousa, M., Rowcliff, S., Henriques, M., & Lemos, M. (2020). A triadic model of intervention with students with learning disabilities: A case study. Revista E-Psi, 9(2), 1-21.
American Psychiatric Association. (2015). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association.
Badri Gargari, R., Nemati, S., & Khani-Salavat, Z. (2020). The effectiveness of mindfulness training on span of working memory in children with specific learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10(1), 200-209. (In Persian).
Ben-Naima, Sh., Laslo-Rotha, R., Einava, M., Birana, H., & Margalita, M. (2017). Academic self-efficacy, sense of coherence, hope, and tiredness among college students with learning disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(1), 18-34.
Benoit, V., & Gabola, P. (2021). Effects of positive psychology interventions on the well-being of young children: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12065), 1-19.
Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health, 13, 119.
Brizhak, Z., Kolesina, K., & Mironenkova, N. (2020). Positive psychology in students’ axiological choice situations. E3S Web of Conferences, 210(20003), 1-3.
Chen, X., & Chen, T. (2022). Positive psychology based on cognitive and behavioral intervention among adolescents with learning difficulties: Current and future applications. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 3(3), 102-105.
Chodkiewicz, A. (2018). School-based positive psychology interventions: The development of a new evaluation process and intervention (Doctoral dissertation). University of Exeter.
Dehghani, Y., Esmaeili, K., & Afshin, S. A. (2022). The effectiveness of hope training on academic engagement, academic burnout, and academic optimism in students with learning disorder. Journal of Exceptional Children, 22(2), 19-36. (In Persian).
Dehghani, Y., Majdian, N., Afshin, S. A., & Farazja, M. (2021). The effectiveness of mindfulness training on planning and cognitive flexibility of students with learning disability. Quarterly Journal of Educational Psychology, 17(60), 111-135. (In Persian).
Eyuboglu, D., Bolat, N., & Eyuboglu, M. (2018). Empathy and theory of mind abilities of children with specific learning disorder (SLD). Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 28(2), 136-141.
Feeney, D. M. (2019). Using positive self-talk and goal-oriented thinking to improve behavioral outcomes for students with learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation). Las Vegas: University of Nevada.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
Garcia-Alvarez, D., Soler, M. J., Cobo-Rendon, R., & Hernandez-Lalinde, J. (2022). Positive psychology applied to education in practicing teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: Personal resources, well-being, and teacher training. Sustainability, 14(11728), 1-12.
Georgiadi, M., Plexousakis, S., Josie, M., Kourkoutas, E., & Hart, A. (2020). How adolescent students with disabilities and/or complex needs perceive the notion of resilience: A study in Greece and England. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(12), 43-69.
Ghadampour, E., Qesari Goodarzi, S., Derakhshanfar, R., & Padervand, H. (2021). The effectiveness of group positive thinking training on improving empathy and social anxiety in male students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10(3), 366-379. (In Persian).
Ghazi Abed, M. (2017). Inculcating positive thinking in the self-concept of children with learning difficulties. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 10(3), 1-10.
Goldberg, J. (2020). Positive education as a whole school approach: Broadening the perspective on learning (Doctoral dissertation). University of Twente.
Hanurawan, F. (2017). The role of psychology in special needs education. Journal of ICSAR, 1(2), 180-184.
Husadani, R., Suryani, N., & Yusuf, M. (2021). Needs analysis: Social skills-based learning model for children with learning disabilities at an inclusive school. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI), 10(1), 90-96.
Keis, Y. A. (2020). The impact of adopting positive education and well-being culture on learners with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) in a private and mainstream school in Dubai: An exploratory case study during uncertain times, a perspective from Dubai, UAE (Master’s thesis). The British University in Dubai.
Keller, J., Ruthruff, E., & Keller, P. (2019). Mindfulness and speed testing for children with learning disabilities: Oil and water? Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(2), 1-25.
Kotera, Y., Green, P., & Sheffield, D. (2022). Positive psychology for mental well-being of UK therapeutic students: Relationships with engagement, motivation, resilience, and self-compassion. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20, 1611–1626.
Kotera, Y., & Ting, S. H. (2021). Positive psychology of Malaysian university students: Impacts of engagement, motivation, self-compassion, and well-being on mental health. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19, 227–239.
Lin, P. Y., Chen, Y. L., Hsiao, R. C., Chen, H. L., & Yen, C. F. (2023). Risks of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and intellectual disability in children delivered by caesarean section: A population-based cohort study. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 80, 103334.
Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60, 541–572.
Macintyre, P., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2019). Setting an agenda for positive psychology in SLA: Theory, practice, and research. Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 262-274.
Mawila, D. (2022). The resilience of learners with specific learning disability in unequally resourced schools for special education needs in diverse contexts. African Journal of Disability, 11(0), 1-7.
Miller, E., & Kass, E. (2019). Enhancing self-efficacy and grit: How educational teams can promote inner strengths of students with disabilities in inclusive schools. Proceedings of EDULEARN19 Conference, 1st-3rd July. Spain: Palma, Mallorca.
Mortazavi Emami, S., Ahghar, G., Pirani, Z., Heidari, H., & Hamidi Pour, R. (2019). The effects of positive psychology intervention on self-efficacy and psychological hardiness of female students. Quarterly Journal of Family and Research, 16(2), 67-82.
Naemi, A. M., & Faeghi, Z. Kh. (2018). Effectiveness of positive psychology-based intervention on self-forgiveness and resilience in mothers of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Exceptional Children, 18(2), 23-38. (In Persian).
Nemati, S., Badri Gargari, R., & Erfani, S. (2021). Academic well-being and self-compassion in students with and without specific learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11(1), 64-79. (In Persian).
Nemati, S., Badri Gargari, R., & Khani-Salavat, Z. (2019). The effect of mindfulness on attention and comprehension in children with specific learning disability with impairment in reading. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, 9(1), 91-104. (In Persian).
Niemiec, R. M., Shogren, K. A., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2017). Character strengths and intellectual and developmental disability: A strengths-based approach from positive psychology. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(1), 13–25.
Ofiesh, N., & Mather, N. (2013). Resilience and the child with learning disabilities. In S. Goldstein & R. B. Brooks (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (pp. 329–348). Springer Science + Business Media.
Samavi, S. A. (2022). Editorial: Positive psychology studies in education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(845199), 1-3.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Positive psychology: An introduction. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 1-9). Springer, Dordrecht.
Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-421.
Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373-386.
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4(3), 219-247.
Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 467-487.
Tejada-Gallardo, C., Blasco-Belled, A., & Alsinet, C. (2022). Impact of a school-based multicomponent positive psychology intervention on adolescents’ time attitudes: A latent transition analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51, 1002-1016.
Tiwari Upadhyay, U. (2020). Effect of positive psychology intervention on emotional well-being of children with specific learning disability in India. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(3), 1255-1277.
Ucak, Y., & Sakalli Demirok, M. (2023). Examining the effectiveness of the educational program developed for English teachers working with students aged 13–18 who have specific learning disability. Children, 10(81), 1-12.
Umucu, E., Lee, B., Genova, H. M., Chopik, W. J., Sung, C., Yasuoka, M., & Niemiec, R. M. (2022). Character strengths across disabilities: An international exploratory study and implications for positive psychiatry and psychology. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13(863977), 1-11.
Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second/foreign language learning and teaching: The past, current status, and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(731721), 1-10.
Wang, Y., & Guan, H. (2020). Exploring demotivation factors of Chinese learners of English as a foreign language based on positive psychology. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 29(1), 851-861.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (2021). The future of positive psychology and disability. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(790506), 1-5.
Wright, D. (2020). Implementing effective positive psychology interventions to support the well-being of young people in schools: A meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized interventions and a Q study of educational psychologists’ perceptions regarding effective implementation (Doctoral dissertation). Cardiff University School of Psychology.
Zach, S., & Yazdi-Ugav, O. (2021). Conceptual model for explaining academic achievements and social functioning of students with and without learning disorders. Sustainability, 13(2559), 1-13.
References [In Persian]
Badri Gargari, R., Nemati, S., & Khani Salavat, Z. (2020). The effectiveness of mindfulness training on the span of working memory in children with specific learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10(1), 32-47. doi: 10.22098/jld.2020.1043.
Dehghani, Y., Ismaeili, K., & Afshin, S. A. (2022). The effectiveness of hope training on academic engagement, academic burnout, and academic optimism in students with learning disorder. Journal of Exceptional Children, 22(2), 19-36.
Dehghani, Y., Majdian, N., Afshin, S. A., & Farazja, M. (2021). The effectiveness of mindfulness training on planning and cognitive flexibility of students with learning disability. Educational Psychology, 17(60), 111-135. doi:10.22054/jep.2022.58244.3252.
Mortazavi Emami, S., Ahghar, G., Pirani, Z., Heidari, H., & Hamidi Pour, R. (2019). The effects of positive psychology intervention on self-efficacy and psychological hardiness of female students. Quarterly Journal of Family and Research, 16(2), 67-82.
Naemi, A. M., & Faeghi, Z. Kh. (2018). Effectiveness of positive psychology intervention on self-forgiveness and resilience in mothers of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Exceptional Children, 18(2), 23-38. doi:10.22034/jec.2018.16826612.1397.18.2.8.7.
Nemati, S., Badri Gargari, R., & Khani-Salavat, Z. (2019). The effect of mindfulness on attention and comprehension in children with specific learning disability with impairment in reading. Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences, 9(1), 91-104. doi:10.22108/cbs.2020.124500.1433.
Sadipour, I., Mirzaee Fandokht, O., Salmabadi, M., & Safara, M. (2018). Comparison of psychological hardiness and subjective vitality between ordinary students and students with specific learning disorder. Middle Eastern Journal of Disability Studies, 8(80), 1-7.
Vismeh, M., Esteki, M., & Mirzakhani Araghi, N. (2023). The comparison of the effectiveness of executive functions training based on computer games and sensory integration on students’ dyslexia symptoms. Journal of Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 13(49), 143-172. doi:10.22054/JPE.2022.62970.2366.