نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه روانشناسی و آموزش کودکان با نیاز‌های خاص، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

2 دانشیار،گروه روانشناسی و آموزش کودکان با نیاز‌های خاص، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده

رشد و توسعه هر جامعه متأثر از نیروی آموزش­دیده آن جامعه بوده و شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر رضایتمندی تحصیلی و فراهم کردن آن­ها، گامی به‌سوی توسعه پایدار است. این پژوهش باهدف کشف و بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر رضایتمندی تحصیلی دانش­آموزان تیزهوش انجام گرفت. روش پژوهش حاضر از نوع کیفی به روش داده­بنیاد بوده و گردآوری داده­ها از طریق مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته انجام گرفت. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر شامل دانش­آموزان دختر و پسر مقطع متوسطه اول مدارس استعداد درخشان شهر تهران در سال تحصیلی 99-1398 بود که نمونه پژوهش به‌صورت نمونه­گیری خوشه­ای انتخاب شد و پس از مصاحبه با 20 دانش­آموز، عوامل مؤثر بر رضایتمندی تحصیلی شناسایی گردید. لازم به ذکر است که تحلیل داده­ها با استفاده از سه مرحله کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی انجام گردید. بر اساس نتایج حاصل از پژوهش، کد­های باز حول 168 مفهوم، کد­های محوری شامل 21 مفهوم و کد­های انتخابی در 5 مفهوم تحت عناوین عوامل مدرسه­ای، عوامل فردی، عوامل خانوادگی، نگرش نسبت به تیزهوشی و مشکلات جامعه در برخورد با تیزهوشان و نبود برنامه نگه­داشت تیزهوشان (برنامه­های جامع از تحصیل تا اشتغال) شناسایی و استخراج گردید. رضایتمندی تحصیلی ابزار مطلوبی برای ارزیابی مدرسه و پیشرفت تحصیلی دانش­آموزان تیزهوش محسوب می­شود و عوامل متعددی دانش­آموز را در ادامه مسیر زندگی تحصیلی و ارتقاء رضایت تحصیلی تقویت می­نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Developing a Model of Academic Satisfaction in Gifted Students based on the Factors Affecting It: A Grounded Theory Study

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sara Nejatifar 1
  • ali aghaziarati, 1
  • Ahmad Abedi 2

1 Department of Psychology and Education of Children with Special Needs, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Psychology and Educational of children with special needs, faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan,Isfahan,Iran

چکیده [English]

The growth and development of any society are affected by the educated force of that society and identifying the factors affecting academic satisfaction and providing them is a step towards sustainable development. The aim of this study was to discover and investigate the factors affecting the academic satisfaction of gifted students. The method of the present study was qualitative using a data-based method and data collection was done through semi-structured interviews. The statistical population of the present study included male and female students of the first high school of talented schools in Tehran in the academic year of 2019-2020. The research sample was selected by cluster sampling and after interviewing 20 students, the effective factors were identified in academic satisfaction. It should be noted that data analysis was performed using three steps of open, axial, and selective coding. Based on the results of the research, open codes around 168 concepts, core codes including 21 concepts, and selective codes in 5 concepts under the headings of school factors, individual factors, family factors, attitudes toward intelligence, and community problems in dealing with the gifted and the lack of a gifted maintenance program (comprehensive programs from education to employment) were identified and extracted. Academic satisfaction is a good tool for evaluating the school and academic achievement of gifted students and strengthens the student's various factors in continuing the path of academic life and promoting academic satisfaction.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Academic Satisfaction
  • Talented Student
  • Grounded Theory
منابع
احمدی، ساره و شیخ­الاسلامی، راضیه. (1390). بررسی رابطه هوش عاطفی و پیشرفت تحصیلی با واسطه­گری رضایت از تحصیل. مطالعات روانشناسی تربیتی، 13 (8)، 20-1.
افروز، غلامعلی. (1386). مقدمه­ای بر روان­شناسی و تربیت کودکان و نوجوانان (چاپ 11). تهران: انتشارات انجمن اولیا و مربیان.
جنکینز، ریچارد. (1381). هویت اجتماعی، مترجم: تورج یار احمدی، تهران: شیرازه.
شورمیج، زینب؛ صدقی، شهرام و طلاچی، هما. (1393). شناسایی عوامل زمینه­ای تاثیر گذار بر رفتار اطلاع­یابی کاربران در تعامل با گزینه جستجوی بصری در پایگاه ابسکو: یک مطالعه گراندد تئوری. تعامل انسان و اطلاعات، 1 (3)، 234-225.
کارشکی، حسین؛ محمدزاده قصر، اعظم؛ تقی­زاده کرمان، نفیسه و گراوند، هوشنگ. (1391). رابطه یادگیری خود­راهبر و رضایت تحصیلی در دانشجویان دانشکده پرستاری و مامایی مشهد. مجموعه مقالات ارائه شده در اولین همایش ملی روانشناسی تربیتی.
منصوریان، یزدان. (1386). گراندد تئوری چیست و چه کاربردی دارد؟ همایش چالش­های علم اطلاعات. دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان: چالش­های علم اطلاعات، 9 و 10 خرداد ماه 1386.
موسوی، سید کمال­الدین و حیدر پور مرند، سکینه. (1391). تحلیل جامعه شناختی بیگانگی تحصیلی دانشجویان (مطالعه موردی: دانشگاه شاهد در سال تحصیلی 1388-1387). فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی، 56 (56)، 71-31.
میرزایی علویجه؛ مهدی، رجایی؛ نرگس، رضایی، فرشته؛ حسن­پور، سمیرا؛ پیروزه، راضیه و بابائی برزآبادی، محسن. (1391). مقایسه  عزت نفس، منبع کنترل و رابطه آن­ها با وضعیت تحصیلی دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی شهید صدوقی یزد. مرکز مطالعات و توسعه آموزش علوم پزشکی یزد، 1 (5)، 70-58.
نصیران، صدیقه و ایروانی، محمدرضا. (1395). بررسی مشکلات دانش­آموزان تیزهوش در مدارس استعداد­های درخشان از نظر دانش­آموزان و والدین. مطالعات روان­شناسی و علوم تربیتی، 2 (1)، 27-1.
 
 
 
References
 
 
Abu-Jaber, A. (2011). Educational programs for gifted students. Teacher Mission Journal, 49 (4), 23-27.
Anthony, R., Artlino, J., Holmboe, S., Steven, J., & Durnin, S. (2012). Can achievement emotions be used to better understand motivation, learning, and performance in medical education? Medical Teacher, 34 (3), 240-244.
Baños, R., Fuentesal, J., Conte, L., Ortiz-Camacho, M., & Zamarripa, J. (2020). Satisfaction, Enjoyment and Boredom with Physical Education as Mediator between Autonomy Support and Academic Performance in Physical Education. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(23), 8898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238898
Bates, E. A., Kaye, L. K., & McCann, J. J. (2017). A snapshot of the student experience: exploring student satisfaction through the use of photographic elicitation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1-14.
Baykal, U., Sokmen, S., Korkmaz, S., & Akgun, E. (2005). Determining student satisfaction in a nursing college. Nurse Educational Today, 25 (4), 255-262.
Beard, K., Hoy, W., & Hoy, A. (2010). Academic optimism of individual teachers: Confirming a new construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1136-1144.
Braten, I., & Stromos, H. (2004). Epistemological belief and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 374-388.
Bryant, J., & Bodfish, S. (2014). The relationship of student satisfaction to key indicators for colleges and universities. National Research Report.
Carvalho, R. G. G. (2016). Gender differences in academic achievement: The mediating role of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 54-58.
Chen, S. H., Main, A., Zhao, Q., Bunge, S. A., Lau, N., & Chu, K. (2015). Effortful control and early academic achievement and satisfaction of Chinese American children in immigrant families. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 30, 45-56.
Dhaqane, M. K., & Afrah, N. A. (2016). Satisfaction of student and academic performance in Benadir University. Journal of Education and Practice, 7 (24), 59-63.
Dunne, M. P., Sun, J., Nguyen, N. D., Truc, T., Loan, K. X., & Dixon, J. (2010). The influence of educational pressure on the mental health of the adolescence in east Asia. Journal of Science Research, Hue University, 6 (1), 18-27.
El Ansari, W., & Oskrochi, R. (2004). What realy affects health professions students’ satisfaction with their educational experience? Implications for practice and research. Nurse Educational Today, 24 (8), 55-644.
Erdogan,Y., Bayram, S., & Deniz, L. (2008). Factors that Influence Academic Achievement and Attitudes in Web Based Education. International Journal of Instruction, 1 (1), 31-48.
  Figuera Gazo, P., Llanes Ordóñez, J., Torrado Fonseca, M., Valls Figuera, R.-G., & Buxarrais Estrada, M. R. (2020). Reasons for Course Selection and Academic Satisfaction among Master’s Degree Students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192720954573
Fleming, A., Oertle, K., Plotner, A., & Hakun, J. (2017). Influence of social factors on student satisfaction among college students with disabilities. Journal of College Student Development, 58 (2), 215-228.
Foster, T. A. (2013). An exploration of academic resilience among rural gifted students living in poverty, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Education, Piedmont College.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept: state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-119.
Freeman, J., Raffan, J., & Warwick, I. (2010). Worldwide provision to develop gifts and talents: An international survey. Research Report.
Gadbois, S., & Sturgeon, R. (2011). Academic self-handicapping: Relationships with learning specific and general self-perceptions and academic performance over time. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81 (2), 22-207.
Goetz, T., Sticca, F., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2016). Intra individual relations between achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: an experience sampling approach. Learning and Instruction, 41 (1), 115-125.
Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1
Halamandaris, K. F., & Power, K. G. (1999). Individual differences, social support and coping with the examination stress; a study of the psychosocial and academic adjustment of first year home students. Personality and Individual Differences,15, 665-685.
Hanssen, T., & Solvoll, G. (2015). The importance of university facilities for student satisfaction at a Norwegian University. Research in Higher Education, 33 (13), 744-759.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abington, Oxon: Routledge.
Holt, L. J. (2014). Attitudes about help-seeking mediate the relation between parent attachment and academic adjustment in first-year college students. Journal of College Student Development, 55 (4), 418-423.
Hoy, W., Tarter, C., & Hoy, A. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43 (3), 425-446.
Khalaf, M. A. (2014). Validity and reliability of the academic resilience scale in Egyptian context. Us-China Education Review, 4 (3), 202-210.
Knorzer, L., Brunken, R., & Park, B. (2016). Facilitators or suppressors: Effects of experimentally induced emotions on multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 44 (1), 97-107.
Lane, K. L., Barton-Arwood, S. M., Nelson, J. R., & Wehby, J. (2008). Academic performance of students with emotional and behavioral disorders served in a self-contained setting. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17 (1), 43-62.
Lent, R. W., Do Ceu Taveira, M., Sheu, H. B., & Singley, D. (2009). Social cognitive predictors of academic adjustment and life satisfaction in portuguese college students: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 190-198.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintruch, P. R. (2002). Achievement goals in the classroom; student learning strategies and motivation process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press Oxford.
Machell, K. A., Blalock, D. V., Kashdan, T. B., & Yuen, M. (2016). Satisfaction at the cost of ambition: The mixed results of a supportive, interactive environment on socially anxious teenagers. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 166-171.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job Burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422.
Nesbitt, K. T., Baker-Ward, L., & Willoughby, M. T. (2013). Executive function mediates socio-economic and racial differences in early academic achievement and satisfaction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28 (4), 774-783.
Neumann, Y. (1990). Quality of learning Experience and students’ college outcome. International Journal of Educational management, 7 (1), 1-16.
Olatunde, P. (2009). Students Attitude towards Mathematics and Satisfaction in some selected secondary schools in Southwestern Nigeria. European Journal of Scientific Research, 36 (3), 336-341.
Park, S. W., Sperling, R. A. (2012). Academic procrastinators and their self-regulation. Psychology, 3 (1), 12-23.
Ray, B. D. (2010). Academic achievement, satisfaction and demographic traits homeschool students: A nationwide study. Academic Leadership: The Online Journal, 8, 1-31.
Senicar, M. Z. (2016). The challenges of planning individualized programs for gifted students. Research in Pedagogy, 6 (2), 138-153.
Simoes, C., Matos, M. G., Tome, G., Ferreira, M., & Chainho, H. (2010). School satisfaction and academic achievement: the effect of school and internal assets as moderators of this relation in adolescents with special needs. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1177-1181.
Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L., & Sigmon, D. R. (2002). Hope theory: Handbook of positive psychology, 257-276. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Tan, J. B., & Yates, Sh. (2011). Academic expectations as sources of stress in Asian Students. Social Psychological Education, 14, 389-407.
Umbach, P. D., & Porter, S. R. (2002). How do academic departments impact student satisfaction? Understanding the contextual effects of departments. Research in Higher Education, 43 (2), 34-209.
Van Den Oorrd, E. J. C. G., & Rossem, R. V. (2002). Differences in First Graders’ s SchoolAdjustment: the role of Classroom Characteristics and Social Structure of the Group. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 371-394.
Verner-Filion, J., & Gaudreau, P. (2010). From perfectionism to academic adjustment: The mediating role of achievement goals. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 181-186.
Zhang, Y., Gan, Y., & Cham, H. (2007). Perfectionism, academic burnout and end engagement. Among Chinese college students. A structural equation modeling analysis. Personality and Individual differences, 43 (6), 1529-1540.