نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

2 استاد گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

3 دانشجوی دکتری علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

10.22054/jpe.2023.75356.2605

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش بررسی نظام‌مند و ارائه فراترکیبی از پژوهش‌های مرتبط با مداخله از نوع سوم یادگیری اجتماعی هیجانی برای دانش‌آموزان مقطع ابتدایی دارای اختلال یادگیری ویژه بود. پژوهش از نوع کیفی با استفاده از راهبرد فراترکیب با رویکردی سنتز پژوهانه بود. داده‌های موردنیاز از طریق جستجوی واژگان کلیدی یادگیری اجتماعی هیجانی، اختلال یادگیری ویژه، اختلال عصب تحولی در منابع کتابخانه‌ای، پایان‌نامه‌ها و مقالات موجود در پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی ERIC،GoogleSchoolar، PubMed، Science Direct، Scopus، springer Magiran، Irandoc در بین سال‌های 1990 تا 2021 جمع‌آوری شد. به‌منظور جستجو در پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی داخلی و خارجی به‌صورت جداگانه و ترکیبی استفاده شد. پایه‌های نظری و مضامین اصلی و ترکیبی استخراج، تحلیل مضمون و طبقه‌بندی شدند. نتایج حاصل از بررسی و تحلیل مطالعات و پژوهش‌های انجام‌شده نشان داد که برنامه مداخله از نوع سوم یادگیری اجتماعی هیجانی در حوزه‌های مشکلات و اختلالات روان‌شناختی اثربخش بوده است. یافته‌های این پژوهش با مشخص نمودن ماهیت برنامه مداخله از نوع سوم یادگیری اجتماعی هیجانی نشان می‌دهد که با توجه به پیشینه نظری و تجربی موجود، این ایده به‌عنوان یک بسته آموزشی برای دانش‌آموزان دارای اختلال یادگیری ویژه قابل‌طرح است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Response to Intervention Program of Third Type of Social-Emotional Learning on Behavioral Problems, Alexithymia, School Bounding and Emotional Regulation Disability: A Synthesis-Research Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • shahrooz nemati 1
  • rahim badri 2
  • Mohammad Arshadtaleshmekaeil 3

1 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

3 PhD Student in Educational Psychology University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research was to systematic examination and present a meta-combination of the research related to the third kind of socio-emotional learning for elementary students with a specific learning disability. The study was qualitative using a meta-combination with synthesis study approach. The needed data were collected through a search of keywords of socio-emotional learning, specific learning disability, a neuro-developmental disorder in the library resources, theses, and the articles existing in the databases of ERIC, Google Scholars, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Springer, Magiran, Irandoc during 1990-2021. In order to search for the information in the Iranian and foreign databases was used both in separation and in combination. The theoretical bases and the main and combination concepts were extracted, and the concept was analyzed and classified. The results of the examination and analysis of the studies and research showed that the intervention program of the third kind of socio-emotional learning was effective in the fields of psychological problems and disorders. The findings of this research by identifying the nature of the intervention program of the third kind of socio-emotional learning show that regarding the existing theoretical and experimental, this idea could be proposed as an instructional package for the students with a specific learning disability.
Keywords: Response to Intervention Program of Third Type of Social-Emotional Learning, Behavioral Problems, Alexithymia, School Bounding, Emotional Regulation.
 
 
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
A specific learning disability is a neuro-developmental disorder that continuously involves learning and a much wider range of cognitive problems that are often ignored in school (Jabarzadeh et al., 1402).
These disorders are identified based on the data obtained from different sources about the emotional or behavioral functions of the person and must appear in at least two different situations, one of which is school (Manuel, 2020). Among the challenges faced by children with specific learning disabilities is alexia (Cerutti et al., 2020), which is used to describe people who cannot identify and express their emotions (Auerbach et al., 2008). Also, they have fewer social skills, and compared to their brothers and sisters, they experience more physical and behavioral problems, they cannot understand and identify their emotions, and instead, they look for their emotional arousal to grow up. and they misinterpret their physical problems (Porcelli et al, 2013). Another concept that is raised in the relationship between the child and the school is the connection with the school, which refers to the relationship that a person has with the school and other aspects of academic life (McDoniel & Bierman, 2022).
Different approaches have been made to help this group of children in the field of special learning disorders, but in the new assessment model called the response-based intervention model, the effort is to emphasize the role of the educational environment in the assessment and interventions of education. This model is based on the identification and determination of shortcomings and inabilities and includes a set of decisions that guide interventions at 3 levels as follows: Interventions aimed at the progress of all students (first level). These interventions are deeper and are used for students who are at risk of academic failure (second level) and then more intensive. It is suitable for students for whom second-level interventions are not enough (third level). The level of progress of these students is tracked and finally, students who have special learning needs and should be examined with diagnostic methods beyond the usual psychological tests are identified (Shojaei and Rostami, 2016).
Therefore, considering the existence of many psychological problems such as behavioral problems, alexia, school connection, and emotional regulation in children with specific learning disabilities, in the present study, the results of research that has been conducted in the field of social-emotional learning approach are examined. By analyzing and combining the results of this research, we can design a framework and an intervention program based on a qualitative study of the research synthesis type. The findings of the present research lead to the expansion and adjustment of the views related to the social-emotional learning approach and specific learning disabilities, and it is a training package for educational psychologists and therapists of specific learning disabilities. Therefore, the main question of this research is raised as follows: What are the components of the social-emotional learning program for students with specific learning disabilities?

Methodology

This qualitative study employed a meta-combination synthesis approach to gather data on socio-emotional learning and specific learning disabilities. Information was collected from various library resources and databases such as ERIC, Google Scholars, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Springer, Magiran, and Irandoc spanning from 1990 to 2021. Theoretical bases and key concepts were extracted, analyzed, and classified to form the foundation of the study.

Results

Through the application of research synthesis methodology and the categorization of data from 14 internal and external sources selected based on their alignment with the research's title, purpose, questions, and methodology, this study has identified 16 subcategories and 8 primary articles. The examination of these sources reveals a notable focus by researchers on the educational framework of social-emotional learning that corresponds with the principles and strategies of social-emotional learning. Consequently, an initiative was taken to construct a comprehensive package by integrating elements such as self-awareness, emotional recognition, regulation strategies, empathy narratives, problem-solving skills, stress-coping mechanisms, decision-making processes, and SMART goal-setting. This holistic approach facilitates a thorough exploration of each foundational aspect of social-emotional learning.

Discussion

 The findings of this study shed light on the crucial role of social and emotional learning training for individuals with special learning disorders, advocating for the integration of such interventions by therapists alongside other treatments. This approach not only fosters social integration and enhances interpersonal relationships among peers but also empowers individuals to gain self-awareness, facilitating improved interactions with peers, teachers, family, and society. The research identified limitations related to emotional expression and regulation influenced by educational and cultural factors, as well as interpersonal and social challenges. Future qualitative research could benefit from incorporating the key concepts derived from this study and exploring their application among the parents of these children. Given the robust theoretical and empirical foundation of the educational package designed for students with special learning disabilities, it stands as a valuable tool to support this demographic.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Response to Intervention Program of Third Type of Social-Emotional Learning
  • Behavioral Problems
  • Alexithymia
  • School Bounding
  • Emotional Regulation
بدری گرگری، ر.، فتحی آذر، ا.، میرنسب، م و احراری، غ. (1395). تأثیر برنامه تلفیقی یادگیری اجتماعی–هیجانی بر شایستگی‌های روانی- اجتماعی دانش‌آموزان. فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی پژوهشنامه تربیتی، (48)11، 20-1.
پیرزادی، ح و شریفی اردانی، ا. (1395). نظریه دلبستگی و مشکلات هیجانی- اجتماعی در دانش‌آموزان با مشکلات ویژه یادگیری: تبیین نظری و کاربردهای بالینی. تعلیم و تربیت استثنایی، (138)1، ۴۷-۵۶.
جبارزاده چهاربرود، م.، بیرامی، م.، نخستین گلدوست، ا؛ و هاشمی، ت. (1402). اثربخشی آموزش خودتعلیمی کلامی بر کارکردهای اجرایی و مهارگری شناختی دانش‌آموزان دارای اختلالات یادگیری خاص. مجله مطالعات روانشناسی تربیتی، doi: 10.22111/jeps.2023.7532.
حافظی، ا.، توکلی قوچانی، ح.، لشکردوست، ح. (1398). اثربخشی آموزش بازی‌درمانی به مادران بر کاهش مشکلات رفتاری دانش‌آموزان پسر دوره ابتدایی مبتلا به اختلال بیش‌فعالی/ کمبود توجه.دانشگاه علوم پزشکی خراسان شمالی، (4) ۱۱، ۱-۹.
رضایی شریف، ع.، حجازی، ا.، قاضی طباطبایی، م؛ و اژه‌ای، ج. (1392). ساخت و آماده‌سازی پرسش‌نامه‌ی پیوند با مدرسه در دانش‌آموزان (SBQ). روان‌شناسی مدرسه و آموزشگاه، (1)3، 55-67. doi: jsp-3-1-93-3-4.
شجاعی، س.، رستمی، ص. (1396). الگوی پاسخ به مداخله برای دانش‌آموزان با نیازهای ویژه. تعلیم و تربیت استثنایی، (146)3، 56-51.
صدری دمیرچی، ا.، اسماعیلی قاضی ‌ولوئی، ف. (1395). اثربخشی آموزش مهارت‌های اجتماعی- هیجانی بر تنظیم شناختی هیجان و مهارت‌های اجتماعی کودکان دارای اختلال یادگیری خاص. ناتوانی‌های یادگیری، 5(4)، 59-86.
ویسمه، م.، استکی، م؛ و میرزاخانی، ن. (1402). مقایسه‌ی اثربخشی آموزش کارکردهای اجرایی مبتنی بر بازی‌های رایانه‌ای و یکپارچگی حسی بر علائم نارساخوانی دانش‌آموزان. روانشناسی افراد استثنایی، (49)13، 172-146.
 
 
References
Abbariki, A., Yazdanbakhsh, K. &  Momeni, K. (2018). The effectiveness of computer-based cognitive rehabilitation on reducing cognitive failure in Students with Learning Disability. Journal of Psychology of Exceptional People, 7(26), 157-127. https://doi.org/10.22054/jpe.2017.22223.1571
Achenbach, T.M,& Rescorla,L.A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school age forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: university of Vermont, Research center of children, Youth & families.
Al-Yagon M, Mikulincer M. (2004). Patterns of close relationships and socioemotional and academic adjustment among school-age children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19(1):12–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2004.00085.x
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fifth Edition Text Revision (DSM-5- TR). Washington, DC. https://www.psychiatry.org/home/page-not-found
Arthure,A. R (2003). The emotional lives of people with learning disability. British Journal of learning Disabilities, 31, 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3156.2003.00193.x
Auerbach, J. G., Gross-Tsur, V., Manor, O., & Shalev, R. S. (2008). Emotional and behavioral characteristics over a six year period in youths with persistent and nonpersistent dyscalculia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 263–273.
Berens, S., Schaefert, R., Baumeister, D., Gauss, A., Eich, W., and Tesarz, J. (2019). Does symptom activity explain psychological differences in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease? Results from a multi-center cross-sectional study. J. Psychology. Research, 126:109836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109836
Bridgeland, J., Bruce, M., & Hariharan, A. (2013). The missing piece: A national teacher survey on how social and emotional learning can empower children and transform schools. A report for Casel. Chicago, IL: Author.
Brovley, M.; Erstad, O.; Herman, J.; Raizen, S. & Ripley, M. (2010). Defining 21st Century Skills. Draft white paper 1. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
Bryan, T.; Burstein, K. & Ergul, C. (2004). The social-emotional side of learning disabilities: A science-based presentation of the state of the art. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 45-51. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/1593631
Cerutti, R., Spensieri, V., Presaghi, F., Renzi, A., Palumbo, N., Simone, A., & Di Trani, M. (2020). Alexithymic traits and somatic symptoms in children and adolescents: A screening approach to explore the mediation role of depression. Psychiatric Quarterly, 1-12. [DOI:10.1007/s11126-020-09715-8]
Chung, M. C., & Chen, Z. S. (2020). The interrelationship between child abuse, emotional processing difficulties, alexithymia and psychological symptoms among chineese adolescents. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 1-15. [DOI:10.1080/15299732.2020.1788689]
Cole, P. M., Michel, M. K., & Teti, L. O. D. (1994). The Development of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation: A Clinical Perspective. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, 73-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1166139
Dougal, C., Gao, P., Mayew, W. J., & Parsons, C. A. (2019). What’s in a (school) name? Racial discrimination in higher education bond markets. J fin Econ, 134(3), 570 -590. https://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/redir.pf?u=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1016%252Fj.jfineco.2019.05.010;h=repec:eee:jfinec:v:134:y:2019:i:3:p:570 -590
Dyson LL. (2003). Children with Learning Disabilities within the Family Context: A Comparison with siblings in Global Self-Concept, Academic Self-Perception and Social Competence. Learning Disabiltise Research Practical, 18(1), 1-9.
Eisenberg, N.; Spinrad, TL. & Eggum, ND. (2010). Emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to children’s maladjustment. Annu Review Clinical Psychology, 6:495. https://doi.org/10.1146%2Fannurev.clinpsy.121208.131208
Elias, M. J. (2010). Sustainability of Social-Emotional Learning and related programs: Lessons from a field study. The International Journal of Emotional Education, 2(1): 17-33
Hagood, D. (2015). Social and Emotional Learning in Preschool and Beyond, Center For Applied Policy In Education – Uc Davis School Of Education.
Jagers, R. J., Rivas-Drake, D., Williams, B. V. (2019). Transformative social and emotional learning (SEL): Toward SEL in service of educational equity and excellence. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920933340
Jagers, R. J., Williams, B., Osher, D. (2019). Family matters: Exploring the role of family socialization and parenting practices in promoting the social and emotional learning of children and youth.
Karizalter, T.J., Caldarella, P., Young, R., Fischer, L., & Warren, J.S. (2016). Implementing Strong Kids school-wide to reduce internalizing behaviors and increase prosocial behaviors. Education and Treatment of Children, 37, 659–680. Retrieved from http://www.educationandtreatmentofchildren.net
Kelinberg, G., & Fernell, D. (2017). Deficits in Attention Motor Control and Perception and other Syndromes Attributed to Minimal Brain Dysfunctional. Journal of Clinics in Developmental Medicine; 12 (5):138-172.
Kuhne, M., & Wiener, j. (2000). Stability of social status of children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 64-75.
Lerner, J. (2003). Learning disabilities: theories, diagnosis and teaching strategies (9 thed). Boston: MA:Houghton Mifflin. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1030011200025185
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P. & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3): 197–215.
McDoniel, M. E., & Bierman, K. L. (2022). Exploring pathways linking early childhood adverse experiences to reduced preadolescent school engagement. Child Abuse Negl, 105572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105572
Operto, F. F, Giovanna Pastorino, G. M., Stellato, M., Morcaldi, L., Vetri, L., Carotenuto, M., Viggiano, A., & Coppola. G. (2020). Facial Emotion Recognition in Children and Adolescents with Specific Learning Disorder. Brain sciences, 10(8), 473. [DOI:10.3390/brainsci10080473]
Osher, D., Mayer, M., Jagers, R., Kendziora, K., Woods, L. (Eds.), Keeping students safe and helping them thrive: A collaborative handbook on school safety, mental health, and wellness (pp. 317–341).
Pasi, R. J. (2001). Higher expectations: promoting social emotional learning and academic achievement in your school, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Pedersen, A., Haslund-Thomsen, H., Curtis, T., & Grønkjær, M. (2020). Talk to Me, Not at Me: An Ethnographic Study on Health-Related Help-Seeking Behavior Among Socially Marginalized Danish Men. Qualitative Health Research, 30(4), 598-609. [DOI:10.1177%2F1049732319868966]
Porcelli, P., Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J., De Carne, M., Leandro, G., & Todarello, O. (2013). Alexithymia as predictor of treatment outcome in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(5), 911-918. [DOI:10.1097/01.psy.0000089064.13681.3b]
Ray, C. E., Elliott, S. N. (2006). Social Adjustment and Academic Achievement: A Predictive Model for Students With Diverse Academic and Behavior Competencies School. Psychology Review, 35(3), 493-501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2006.12087980
Taklavi S (2011). Traning mothers in play therapy and its effects on the behavior problem of learning disabled children. 1(1), 44-59.
van den Broeck, A.; Vansteenkiste, M.; De Witte, H.; Soenens, B. & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 981–1002. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1348/096317909X481382
References [In Persian]
Badri, R., Fathi, E., Mirnasab, M., & Ehrari, G. (2016). The Effect of Integrative Social and Emotional Learning Program on Students' Psycho-social Competencies. Educational researches11(48), 1-20.
Jabarzadeh Chaharbrod, M., Beyrami, M., Nokhestin Goldost, A., & HAshemi, T. (2023). The Effectiveness of Self-instruction training on Executive Functions and Cognitive Inhibition of Students with Special Learning Disorder. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies. doi: 10.22111/jeps.2023.7532
Pirzadi, H. & sharifi-ardani, A. ()2016.Attachment Theory and Socioemotional Problems in Students with Learning Disorder: Theoretical Explanation and Clinical Applications. J Except Educ, 1 (138), 47-56 URL: http://exceptionaleducation.ir/article-1-760-fa.html
Rezaei Sharif, A., Hejazi, E., Gazi Tabatabaei, M., & Ejei, J. (2014). Developing and preparation of school bonding questionnaire (SBQ) in students. Journal of School Psychology3(1), 55-67. doi: jsp-3-1-93-3-4
Sadri Damirchi, A. & Esmaili Ghazivaloii, F. (2016). Effectiveness of social- emotional skills training on cognitive emotion regulation and social skills in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities5(4), 59-86.
Shojaee, S. & Rostami, S. (2017). The Model of Response to Intervention for Students with Special Needs. J Except Educ, 3 (146):51-56. URL: http://exceptionaleducation.ir/article-1-1081-fa.html
Vismeh, M., Esteki, M., Mirzakhani Araghi, N. (2023). The Comparison of the Effectiveness of Executive Functions Training Based on Computer Games and Sensory Integration on Students’ Dyslexia Symptoms. Journal of Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 13(49), 143-172. doi: 10.22054/JPE.2022.62970.2366.