نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

اختلال­های یادگیری باعث بروز چالش­های متعددی در حوزه تحصیلی دانش­آموزان شده و بر عملکرد تحصیلی و اجتماعی کودکان اثر منفی دارد. هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی تأثیر آموزش تکلیف محور بر مهارت خواندن و نوشتن دانش­آموزان با اختلال یادگیری بود. روش پژوهش حاضر نیمه آزمایشی با طرح پیش­آزمون- پس‌آزمون با گروه گواه بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل دانش­آموزان پایه سوم ابتدائی دارای اختلال یادگیری شهرستان اسلام­آباد غرب (استان کرمانشاه) بود. از بین دانش­آموزان پایه سوم نمونه­ای هدفمند به تعداد 34 نفر انتخاب و به‌صورت تصادفی در دو گروه آزمایش (17 نفر) و گواه (17 نفر) جایگذاری شدند. ابزار پژوهش شامل آزمون خواندن کرمی­نوری و مرادی (1384) و آزمون نوشتن محقق ساخته (1397) بود. برای گروه آزمایش 11 جلسه تدریس و تمرین به‌صورت تکلیف­محور، اجرا شد و گروه گواه در صف انتظار باقی ماند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد آموزش تکلیف­محور بر مهارت خواندن و نوشتن دانش­آموزان با اختلال یادگیری تأثیر معناداری داشت. بر اساس نتایج می­توان گفت که آموزش تکلیف­محور باعث بهبود و پیشرفت مهارت خواندن و نوشتن دانش­آموزان با اختلال یادگیری شد. ازاین‌رو پیشنهاد می‌شود معلمان دوره ابتدایی از روش آموزش تکلیف­محور برای دانش­آموزانی که دارای اختلال خواندن و نوشتن هستند، استفاده کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Task-Oriented Teaching on Reading and Writing Skills of Students with Dyslexia and Dysgraphia

نویسندگان [English]

  • Marzyeh Eslamian 1
  • Seyed Rasoul Emadi 2

1 MA in Educational Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Abstract
Learning disorders cause many challenges in the academic field of students and have a negative effect on the academic and social performance of children. The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect of task-oriented teaching on the reading and writing skills of students with learning disabilities. The method of the current research was semi-experimental with a pre-test and post-test design with a control group. The statistical population of the research included third-grade primary students with dyslexia and dysgraphia in West Islamabad city (Kermanshah Province). A targeted sample of 34 students was selected from among the third-grade students and randomly assigned to two experimental (17 students) and control (17 students) groups. The research tools included Kormi Nouri's reading test (2005) and the researcher-made writing test (2017). For the experimental group, 11 practice sessions were conducted in the form of task-oriented teaching, and the control group remained on the waiting list. The results of the research showed that task-oriented teaching had a significant effect on the reading and writing skills of students with learning disabilities. Based on the results, it can be said that task-oriented teaching improved the reading and writing skills of students with learning disabilities. Therefore, it is suggested that primary school teachers use the task-oriented teaching method for students who have reading and writing disorders.
Keywords: task-oriented teaching, reading skill, writing skill, learning disability.
 
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Reading disability is the most common learning disability that affects 7 to 17 percent of children worldwide and is characterized by normal intelligence, poor reading performance despite adequate education, and poor spelling (Peters et al, 2021). Dyslexic children have cognitive deficits in visual processing, selective and sustained attention, and executive functions. They have problems in phonological processing, recognizing sounds in words and recognizing rhymes (Abdollahzadeh Rafi and Rahimzadeh, 2020). Difficulty in writing is determined by the disorder and weakness in the skills that are important in the writing process, such as writing speed, legibility of letters, and fine motor coordination, and weakness in any of these skills can make learning difficult. The prevalence of both learning disabilities is higher in boys than in girls (Romanovska et al, 2021).
One of the relatively new methods of teaching is task-oriented teaching, which is one of the active teaching approaches. In this approach, due to the continuous interaction of students with each other and their active participation in learning, social skills will increase and they will have high self-confidence. They can easily apply what they have learned in the real environment (Neto et al, 2021). From the point of view of Ellis (2009), Ellis (2009) the task-oriented method is a kind of communicative teaching method that emphasizes meaningful learning through doing tasks in the educational environment of learners. In simpler terms, it refers to a method in which assignments are used as the core of education (Roh and Kwag, 2018).
In general, the conducted research shows that the education of children with learning disorders requires special education, and also considering the background and prevalence of about 10 to 20 percent of learning disorders in children and the need of these children for special education methods, and the lack of research on the task-oriented teaching method in the field of learning disorders in the country, the present research seeks to examine the question of whether task-oriented teaching has an effect on the reading and writing skills of students with reading and writing disorders.
Method
The current research design was semi-experimental with a pre-test-post-test design with a control group. The statistical population of the research was male students in the third grade of elementary school with dyslexia and dysgraphia who were studying in the schools of West Islamabad city in 2018. Among the examined children, a sample of 34 subjects was selected according to the entry criteria and then assigned to two experimental and control groups (17 experimental, 17 control). In order to collect the data, the reading test of Karami Nouri and Moradi (2004) and the writing test developed by the researcher were used. In this research, the task-oriented method was used based on the book "Read and Write" in the third grade of elementary school. The content and educational materials were prepared completely based on the textbook in 11 sessions of 40 minutes. In this way, the experimental group was trained in the task-oriented method and the control group was trained in the usual way. At the end of the intervention, a post-test was taken from both groups. In this research, to analyze the collected data, the mean and standard deviation of the variables were checked using descriptive statistics, and multivariate covariance analysis was used to investigate the research question. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 27.
Results
Table 1 reporting the results of the analysis of covariance shows that after obtaining basic assumptions, there is a significant difference between the experimental and control groups on reading and writing (P<0. 01). Based on the results, after the intervention, the mean score of reading and writing have increased in the experimental group compared to the control group.

Conclusion
In explaining these findings, according to Baldi et al.'s (2015) point of view, it can be mentioned that educational experts believe that the use of process-oriented teaching methods, such as the task-oriented method, is a way to solve problems and eliminate the shortcomings of traditional reading teaching methods. Collaborative and two-way learning is superior to common one-way educational models, and it is emphasized to use two-way educational processes more than one-way transfer processes to improve reading. In fact, the general goal of task-oriented education is to create motivation for learning through activities based on meaning and form. In this method, all three dimensions of structure, performance and interaction are given importance (Operto et al., 2020). According to Ellis (2009), in this method, the use of things like asking, answering, explaining, searching, analyzing, creating and evaluating provides the possibility of interaction for the learner. In task-based education, attention, accuracy, evaluation, practice and coordination between different letters and words are emphasized in the process of checking and doing the task, and the students are fully involved in the exercises and with more motivation and self-efficacy while doing the exercises. In this way, their reading skills are strengthened.
According to Joshi and Bouck (2017), it is possible that children in a task-oriented approach perform various exercises to improve concentration and strengthen visual and auditory memory according to their ability level, which promotes effective writing. It seems that choosing and arranging appropriate words and vocabulary and understanding short phrases requires the process of word recognition, and this recognition is one of the complex activities of the nervous system of the brain (Wicki and Lichtsteiner, 2018). The fact that the child can find the right word to complete the sentence in the empty space and can determine the role of each word in the sentence is not an easy process for children with learning disabilities and it requires a lot of practice and homework, so the task-oriented approach can play an effective role in improving children's writing ability by using multi-sensory intervention such as auditory, visual and tactile senses and providing different assignments. One of the limitations of the present study was the limited sample of male students; another limitation was the impossibility of a completely random selection of the participants, and a follow-up stage was not possible. Therefore, it is suggested to conduct this issue in future research by randomly selecting a sample consisting of male and female students and by conducting a follow-up test.
Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines
This article was extracted from the Master thesis of the first author in the field of educational sciences of Bu-Ali Sina University. The principle of confidentiality and ethical considerations were observed in the research.
Acknowledgment
We express our gratitude to the officials of the Department of Education and the school principals and students who cooperated in the implementation of this project.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest for this study.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • task-oriented teaching
  • reading skill
  • writing skill
  • learning disability
منابع
برقی، اسماعیل؛ استکی، مهنار؛ صالحی، مهدیه. (1398). اثربخشی آموزش توانایی‌های شناختی بر حافظه کاری کلامی و غیرکلامی دانش­آموزان نارساخوان. روانشناسی افراد استثنایی، 9(34)، 159-181. https://doi.org/10.22054/jpe.2019.41252.1971
پورچیت ساز، فاطمه؛ برزگر بفرویی، کاظم و زارع، مریم. (1402). اثربخشی آموزش راهبردهای نقشه‌برداری از داستان و درک مطلب بر بهبود مهارت‌های خواندن دانش‌آموزان دارای مشکلات خواندن. روانشناسی افراد استثنایی، 13(49)، 173-207. https://doi.org/ 10.22054/jpe.2023.69792.2480
حسینی، مریم؛ مرادی، علیرضا؛ کرمی نوری، رضا؛ حسنی، جعفر و پرهون، هادی. (1395). بررسی اعتبار و روایی عاملی آزمون خواندن و نارساخوانی (نما). تازه‌های علوم شناختی، 18(1)، 22-34. https://sid.ir/paper/82734/fa
صفری، ندا؛ باعزت، فرشته و غفاری، مجید. (1399). اثربخشی برنامه توان‌بخشی شناختی توجه بر ابعاد توجه و کارآمدی خواندن دانش‎آموزان نارساخوان. فصلنامه سلامت روان کودک. ۷ (۳)، ۱۶۷-۱۸۱. URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-665-fa.html
طهمورث، مینا و ساداتی فیروزآبادی، سمیه. (1401). بررسی اثربخشی برنامه توالی واجی لیندامود بر توجه پایدار دانش‌آموزان با اختلال خواندن. روانشناسی افراد استثنایی، 12(48)، 173-198. http://doi: 10.22054/jpe.2023.67992.2457
عبداله­زاده رافی، مهدی و رحیم­زاده، مهسا. (1399). تعیین کارآمدترین تکلیف نامیدن خودکار سریع در تمیز دانش‌آموزان با و بدون نارساخوانی فارس زبان. روانشناسی افراد استثنایی، 10(40)، 133-155. https://doi.org/10.22054/jpe.2021.51124.2140
گنجی، مهدی. (1402). آسیب­شناسی روانی بر اساس DSM - 5 (جلد اول). تهران: انتشارات ساوالان. URL: https://db.ketab.ir/bookview.aspx?bookid=2524556
محمدی مولود، سعید؛ مصرآبادی، جواد و حبیبی، رامین. (1399). اثربخشی مداخله‌های آموزشی و درمانی بر اختلال یادگیری ویژه: یک مطالعه فراتحلیلی. فصلنامه کودکان استثنایی، 20(2)، 115-130. http://joec.ir/article-1-733-fa.html
همتی علمدارلو، قربان و توکلی، فریبا. (1399). اثربخشی بازی‌های توجه بر عملکرد خواندن دانش‌آموزان دختر با نارساخوانی. مجله مطالعات روانشناسی تربیتی، 1740()، 53-34. doi: 10.22111/jeps.2021.5897
 
References
Abdollahzadeh Rafi, M., & Rahimzadeh, M. (2020). Determine the most effective rapid automatized naming tasks (RAN) for discrimination of Persian language students with and without dyslexia. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 10(40), 133-155. https://doi.org/ 10.22054/jpe.2021.51124.2140 [In Persian].
Baldi, S., Nunzi, M., & Di Brina, C. (2015). Efficacy of a Task-Based Training Approach in the Rehabilitation of Three Children with Poor Handwriting Quality: A Pilot Study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 120(1), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.2466/10.15.PMS.120v15x5
Barqi, E., & Esteki, M. (2019). The Effectiveness of Teaching Cognitive Ability to Verbal and Non-verbal working memory of students with dyslexia. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 9 (34), 181-159. https://doi.org/10.22054/jpe.2019.41252.1971 [In Persian].
Biotteau, M., Danna, J., Baudou, E., Puyjarinet, F., Velay, J.-L., Albaret, J.-M., Chaix, Y. (2019). Developmental coordination disorder and dysgraphia: Signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and rehabilitation. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 15, 1873–1885. https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s120514
Biotteau, M.; Péran, P.; Vayssière, N.; Tallet, J.; Albaret, J.-M.; Chaix, Y. (2017). Neural changes associated to procedural learning and automatization process in Developmental Coordination Disorder and/or Developmental Dyslexia. European Journal of Pediatric Neurology, 21, 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.07.025
Chitsaz, F., Barzegar Bafroie, K., & Zare, M. (2023). The Effectiveness of Story Mapping and Comprehension Sterategies to Improve Reading Skills for Students with Reading Problems. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 13(49), 173-207. https://doi.org/10.22054/jpe.2023.69792.2480 [In Persian].
Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
Ganji, M. (1402). Psychopathology based on DSM-5 (first volume). Tehran: Savalan Publications. URL: https://db.ketab.ir/bookview.aspx?bookid=2524556 [In Persian].
Hanley, R. J., & Sotiropoulos, A. (2018). Developmental surface dysgraphia without surface dyslexia, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 35(5), 333-341, http://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2018.1468317
Hautala, J., Salmerón, L., Tolvanen. A., Loberg, O., Leppane, P. (2022). Task‑oriented reading efficiency: interplay of general cognitive ability, task demands, strategies and reading fluency. Reading and Writing, 35, 1787–1813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10265-71 3
Hemati Almdarloo, G., & Tavakoli, F. (2020). The Efficacy of Attention Plays on Reading Performance of Female Students with Dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 17(40), 53-34. doi: 10.22111/jeps.2021.5897 [In Persian].
Hosseini, M., Moradi, A., Kormi Nouri, A., Hassani, J., & Parhoon, H. (2016). Reliability and validity of reading and dyslexia test (Nema). Advances in Cognitive Science, 18(1), 22-34. https://sid.ir/paper/82734/en [In Persian].
Hyeong-Min, K., & Sung-Won, K. (2021). Changes in the Reading ability of Children with Borderline Intelligence by Task-Oriented Multi-Sensory Exercise Programs. Annals of R.S.C.B., 25(6), 20348 – 20359. http://annalsofrscb.ro
Joshi, G.S., & Bouck, E.C. (2017). Examining Postsecondary Education Predictors and Participation for Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415572894
Kang, O. R., Kim, Y. O., Woo, J. H., & Byun, C. S. (2014). A Study of Comparison of Reading Characteristics among Students with Dyslexia at Risk, Underachievers in Reading, and General Students by Using a Dyslexia Screening Checklist. The Korea Leeming Disabilities Association, 11(3), 93-116. https://scholar.google.com/scholar
Lee, Y., & De La Paz, S. (2021). Science Writing Intervention Research for Students with and at Risk for Learning Disabilities, and English Learners: A Systematic Review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(4), 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/07319487211018213
Lichtsteiner, S. H., Wicki, W. & Falmann, P. (2018). Impact of handwriting training on fluency, spelling and text quality among third graders. Reading and Writing, 31, 1295–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9825-x
Lichtsteiner, S.; Nideröst, M.; Di Brina, C.; Marquardt, C.; Wyss, S.; Buholzer, A.; Wicki, W. (2023). Effectiveness of Psychomotor Therapy among Children with Graphomotor Impairment with and without DCD-Diagnosis. Children, 10(6): 964. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10060964
López-Escribano, C., Martín-Babarro, J., Pérez-López, R. (2022). Promoting Handwriting Fluency for Preschool and Elementary-Age Students: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis of Research From 2000 to 2020. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 841573. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.841573
McCloskey, M., Rapp, B. (2017). Developmental dysgraphia: An overview and framework for research. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(4): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2017.1369016
Miyahara, M., Hillier, S. L., Pridham, L., & Nakagawa, S. (2017). Task‐oriented interventions for children with developmental co‐ordination disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2(7): 25. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010914.pub2
Mohammadi Molod, S., Mesrabadi, J., & Habibi Kaleybar, R. (2020). Effectiveness of Educational and Therapeutic Interventions on Specific Learning Disorder: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Exceptional Children, 20 (2):115-130. URL: http://joec.ir/article-1-733-fa.html [In Persian].
Neto, J. L., Steenbergen, B., Zamuner, A. R., & Tudella, E. (2021). Wii training versus non-Wii task-specific training on motor learning in children with developmental coordination disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 64(2), 101390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2020.03.013
Operto, F. F., Pastorino, G. M. G., Stellato, M., Morcaldi, L., Vetri, L., Carotenuto, M., et al. (2020). Facial emotions recognition in children and adolescents with specific learning disorder. Brain Sciences, 10, 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10080473
Overvelde A., Hulstijn W. (2011) Handwriting development in Grade 2 and Grade 3 primary school children with normal, at risk, or dysgraphia characteristics. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 540–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.027
Pankey, R. H. (2022). Dysgraphia intervention: A mixed-methods examination of a dyslexic dysgraphia and motor dysgraphia intervention. Ph.D. Dissertation of Education (Literacy), Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas. https://www.proquest.com/openview/090c1f1d15168cb54295b01c10b2c9f8/1
Peters, J.L., Crewther, S.G., Murphy, M.J. et al. (2021). Action video game training improves text reading accuracy, rate and comprehension in children with dyslexia: a randomized controlled trial. Scientific Reports, 11, 18584. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98146-x
Roh, H. L., & Kwag, S. W. (2018). The effect of task-oriented multi-sensory movement program on self-efficacy and writing ability of children with ADHD tendency accompanied by learning delays. The Journal of Korean society of community based occupational therapy, 8(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.18598/kcbot.2018.8.2.01
Romanovska, L., Janssen, R., & Bonte, M. (2021).Cortical responses to letters and ambiguous speech vary with reading skills in dyslexic and typically reading children, NeuroImage: Clinical, 30, 102588, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102588
Safari, N., Baezzat, F., & Ghaffari, M., (2020). Effectiveness of Cognitive Rehabilitation Program on Attention Dimensions and Reading Efficacy in Students with Dyslexia. Journal of Child Mental Health, 7 (3):167-181 URL: http://childmentalhealth.ir/article-1-665-fa.html [In Persian].
Smith-Spark, J.H., Gordon, R. (2022). Automaticity and Executive Abilities in Developmental Dyslexia: A Theoretical Review. Brain Sciences, 12(4): 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12040446
Tahmoures, M., & Sadati Firozabadi, S. (2022). Evaluation of Effectiveness of Linda mood Phonological Sequence Program on Sustained Attention of Students with Dyslexia. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 12(48), 173-198. https://doi.org. 10.22054/jpe.2023.67992.2457
Visser, L., Röschinger, J., Barck, K., Büttner, G., Hasselhorn, M. (2020). Learning Difficulties in Children with Symptoms of DCD And/or ADHD: Analyses from a Categorical and a Continuous Approach. International Journal of Educational Development, 69, 1505–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1786023
Vlachos, F., & Avramidis, E. (2020). The Difference between Developmental Dyslexia and Dysgraphia: Recent Neurobiological Evidence. International Journal of Neuroscience and Behavioral Science 8(1): 1-5. http://doi.org/10.13189/ijnbs.2020.080101
Wicki, W., Lichtsteiner, S.H. (2018). Improvement of handwriting automaticity among children treated for graphomotor difficulties over a period of six months. Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, & Early Intervention, 11(2): 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2018.1432440
Zaghlool, Z., Al- Ajeely, S., Abu Sneineh, O., & Alkhawaldeh, M. (2023). Using Task-based Activities to Improve the Writing skills of Students with Learning Disabilities. Information Sciences Letters, 12(2), 789-793. https://digitalcommons.aaru.edu.jo/isl/vol12/iss2/44
Zaragas, H., Fragkomichelaki, O., Geitona, M., Sofologi, M., Papantoniou, G., Sarris, D., Pliogou, V., Charmpatsis, C., Papadimitropoulou, P. (2023). The Effects of Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents with Developmental Coordination Disorder. Neurology International, 15(3): 804-820. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint15030051
 
استناد به این مقاله: اسلامیان، مرضیه.، عمادی، سید رسول. ‌(1402). تأثیر آموزش تکلیف‌محور بر مهارت خواندن و نوشتن دانش‌آموزان با اختلال نارساخوانی و نارسانویسی، روان‌شناسی افراد استثنایی، 13(52)، 31-60. ‌ DOI: 10.22054/JPE.2023.75639.2611
 
 Psychology of Exceptional Individuals is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.