نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

2 استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

3 استاد گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران

10.22054/jpe.2025.84141.2787

چکیده

ناتوانی یادگیری شامل مشکلاتی در زمینه خواندن، نوشتن، گوش دادن، حل مسائل ریاضی و درک یا کاربرد زبان گفتاری است که موانع قابل‌توجهی را برای دانش‌آموزان ایجاد می‌کند و موجب مشکلاتی در مسائل تحصیلی و عملکرد شناختی می‌شود. پژوهش حاضر باهدف تعیین رابطه حساسیت به طرد با مشکلات رفتاری عاطفی دانش‌آموزان با ناتوانی یادگیری با نقش میانجی تنظیم هیجان انجام شد. این مطالعه ازنظر هدف، کاربردی و ازنظر نحوه گردآوری داده‍ها (طرح تحقیق) از پژوهش‍های توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر، کلیه دانش‌آموزان با ناتوانی یادگیری در مراکز اختلال یادگیری شهر کرمانشاه در سال تحصیلی 1403-1402 بود. تعداد 282 نفر به روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شد. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه‌های مشکلات رفتاری عاطفی راتر (1975)، هوش هیجانی برادبری و گریوز (2005) و خودکارآمدی شرر و مادکس (1982) استفاده شد. تمام تحلیل‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای SPSS27 و نرم‌افزار Lisrel 8.8 انجام شدند. یافته‌ها نشان داد که هوش هیجانی و خودکارآمدی بر مشکلات رفتاری عاطفی دانش‌آموزان با ناتوانی یادگیری اثر منفی معنادار دارند. همچنین خودکارآمدی توانست میانجی روابط بین متغیرهای پژوهش باشد؛ بنابراین متغیر هوش هیجانی علاوه براثر مستقیم، به‌طور غیرمستقیم و از طریق خودکارآمدی نیز بر مشکلات رفتاری عاطفی تأثیر می‍گذارند. (01/0>P). با توجه‌ به یافته‌های پژوهش، در مراکز مشاوره و کلینیک‌های روان‌شناسی می‍توان در مورد تنظیم و کنترل هیجانات و خودکارآمدی درزمینه هوش هیجانی باهدف برقراری تعاملات سازنده با دیگران در کودکان با ناتوانی یادگیری به والدین و معلمان آموزش‌های لازم ارائه شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Emotional-Behavioral Problems in Students with Learning Disabilities

نویسندگان [English]

  • bahare Rezaie 1
  • Sanaz eyni 2
  • Mehdi zemestani 3

1 MA in Clinical Psychology, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

چکیده [English]

 
Abstract
Learning disabilities involve difficulties in reading, writing, listening, solving mathematical problems, and understanding or using spoken language, leading to challenges in academic performance and cognitive functioning. The present study aimed to examine the relationship between emotional intelligence and behavioral-emotional problems in students with learning disabilities, with self-efficacy serving as a mediating factor. This study was applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-correlational in terms of data collection method. The statistical population consisted of all students with learning disabilities attending learning disorder centers in Kermanshah during the 2023-2024 academic year, with a total of 282 participants selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using the Rutter Emotional-Behavioral Problems Questionnaire (1975), the Bar-On Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (2005), and the Sherer and Maddux Self-Efficacy Scale (1982). All analyses were conducted using SPSS 27 and LISREL 8.8 software. The findings revealed that emotional intelligence and self-efficacy have a significant negative effect on the behavioral-emotional problems of students with learning disabilities, with self-efficacy mediating the relationship between the variables. This indicates that emotional intelligence not only has a direct effect but also an indirect effect on behavioral-emotional problems through self-efficacy (p < 0.01). Based on these findings, it is recommended that counseling centers and psychological clinics provide training for parents and teachers on emotion regulation, emotional control, and self-efficacy strategies related to emotional intelligence to foster constructive interactions with children who have learning disabilities.
Keywords: emotional behavioral problems, emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, learning disabilities
 
 
 
Extended Abstract

Introduction

Learning disabilities encompass difficulties in areas such as reading, writing, listening, solving mathematical problems, and understanding or using spoken language (Donalto et al., 2022). Children with learning disabilities commonly face emotional and behavioral problems, which are defined as emotional and behavioral responses that deviate from cultural, age-related, and ethnic norms (Laganière et al., 2022).
A significant contributing factor to behavioral problems in students with learning disabilities is deficits in emotional intelligence (Kousha et al., 2021). Emotional intelligence encompasses the ability to understand, process, and utilize emotions to effectively navigate life situations. This includes the capacity to employ both one's own emotions and those of others to achieve optimal outcomes with maximal satisfaction (Zhi et al., 2023). Students with well-developed emotional intelligence demonstrate greater responsibility, enhanced interpersonal skills, and stronger self-confidence, which are associated with fewer behavioral problems and improved academic performance (Kousha et al., 2021).
Students with learning disabilities frequently demonstrate diminished self-efficacy, stemming from lowered self-esteem and reduced confidence in their capabilities (Nourizadeh, 2022). This impaired self-efficacy negatively impacts their capacity to manage challenges, consequently intensifying their difficulties. Self-efficacy represents an individual's conviction in their ability to organize and implement necessary actions to accomplish specific tasks successfully. As a fundamental psychological construct, it significantly influences cognitive processes, emotional responses, motivational levels, and behavioral patterns (Rahardjo et al., 2023).
Research Question
While previous studies have explored various aspects of learning disabilities, no comprehensive investigation has systematically examined the underlying factors contributing to emotional and behavioral problems in this student population. This represents a significant gap in the current literature. Consequently, the present study seeks to address this gap by investigating the mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between emotional intelligence and emotional-behavioral problems among students with learning disabilities.

Literature Review

Empirical research demonstrates that diminished emotional intelligence in students with learning disabilities correlates with increased behavioral problems (Aghdasi & Shekrollahpour, 2023). A growing body of evidence substantiates the predictive relationship between emotional intelligence and behavioral difficulties in this population, as demonstrated by multiple studies (Bashari Ghomi et al., 2024; Al-Olaywi, 2021; Dalash & Zubeidat, 2023). Due to recurrent academic setbacks, these students frequently experience both behavioral and motivational challenges. Notably, one of the most profound consequences of persistent academic struggles is the erosion of self-efficacy beliefs (Cumming et al., 2021).
The research findings consistently underscore the pivotal role of self-efficacy in influencing emotional and behavioral outcomes among students with learning disorders (Nourizadeh, 2022; Cumming et al., 2021). Supporting this evidence, Ab-Halim et al. (2019) demonstrated that enhanced self-efficacy in students with special needs is associated with the adoption of more adaptive coping strategies and measurable improvements in overall performance.

Methodology

This applied research study adopted a descriptive-correlational design. The target population comprised all students with diagnosed learning disabilities attending specialized learning disorder centers in Kermanshah during the 2023-2024 academic year. Using a purposive sampling technique, we selected 282 participants who met the study criteria. Data collection employed three validated instruments: (1) the Rutter Emotional Behavioral Problems Questionnaire (1975), (2) the Bar-On Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (2005), and (3) the Sherer and Maddux Self-Efficacy Scale (1982). We conducted statistical analyses using SPSS 24 and LISREL 8.8, applying Pearson correlation coefficients, Sobel test for mediation effects, and the Variance Accounted For (VAF) index. All analyses maintained a significance threshold of p < 0.05.

Results

The study included 282 students with diagnosed learning disabilities (mean age = 9.65 ± 2.78 years; range: 7-12 years). The sample comprised 60.6% males (n = 171) and 39.4% females (n = 111). Table 1 presents the correlation matrix of all study variables.
Table 1. Correlation matrix of research variables




Variables


Emotional Behavioral Problems


Emotional Intelligence


Self-efficacy




Emotional Behavioral Problems


1


 


 




Emotional Intelligence


-0.40**


1


 




Self-efficacy


-0.45**


0.51**


1




P**<0.01 p*<0.05
According to the results presented in Table 2, there is a significant negative correlation between emotional-behavioral problems and both emotional intelligence and self-efficacy (r = -0.45, p < 0.01) at the 99% confidence level.
Table 2. Direct effects and indirect effects




Variables


Path Coefficients


T-Value


Standard Error


Significance






Emotional Intelligence


 


Emotional Behavioral Problems


-0.24


-3.88


0.078


P<0.01




Emotional Intelligence


 


self-efficacy


0.50


9.87


0.022


P<0.01




self-efficacy


 


Emotional Behavioral Problems


-0.33


-4.37


0.039


P<0.01




 




Indirect Effects


T-Sobel


Standard Path Coeficient


VAF Statistics


Significance






Emotional Intelligence


 


self-efficacy


 


Emotional Behavioral Problems


9.733


0.165


0.407


P<0.01



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



 
Table 4 demonstrates statistically significant path coefficients (p < 0.01) for all direct effects between study variables. The significant t-value for the indirect path confirms that emotional intelligence affects emotional-behavioral problems through both direct and indirect (mediated by self-efficacy) pathways. The Variance Accounted For (VAF) analysis revealed that self-efficacy mediates 40.7% of the total effect of emotional intelligence on emotional-behavioral problems, indicating substantial partial mediation.

Discussion

This study investigated the relationship between emotional-behavioral problems and emotional intelligence, with particular emphasis on self-efficacy's mediating role. Our results demonstrate that emotional intelligence exerts both direct and indirect effects (through self-efficacy) on emotional-behavioral problems among students with learning disabilities. These findings partially align with previous research by Cumming et al. (2021) and Ab-Halim et al. (2019).
The observed mediation effect can be understood through the lens of emotional competence. Individuals with higher emotional intelligence demonstrate superior capacity for emotion understanding and regulation, facilitating environmental adaptation and social comprehension. Specifically, effective emotion regulation encompasses: (1) strategic engagement with or disengagement from emotional states, (2) continuous emotional monitoring and reflection, and (3) cognitive reappraisal of situational contexts. These regulatory processes share conceptual overlap with core self-efficacy attributes, particularly the capacity to manage unforeseen challenges and cultivate adaptive responses (Morton et al., 2014).
Students with learning disabilities frequently experience significant challenges in establishing and maintaining positive peer relationships, often demonstrating maladaptive behaviors in social contexts (Ab-Halim et al., 2019). This pattern commonly results in peer rejection, which subsequently undermines emotional intelligence competencies—particularly self-awareness, self-regulation, and social awareness. When combined with low self-efficacy, these students tend to: (1) perceive minor challenges as insurmountable obstacles, (2) interpret routine difficulties as threatening situations, (3) catastrophize problems, and (4) engage in excessive worry about improbable negative outcomes. Such cognitive distortions typically lead to heightened anxiety and impaired academic and social functioning (Bishara & Kaplan, 2022).

Conclusion

Based on the findings, it is recommended that caregivers, parents, and educators adopt targeted motivational strategies to strengthen self-efficacy in students with learning disabilities. Integrating such interventions into family education programs, teacher training workshops, and student skill-building sessions can enhance awareness of how parent-child and teacher-child interactions contribute to behavioral challenges. This holistic approach will empower stakeholders to implement more effective, coordinated efforts to reduce behavioral difficulties and promote adaptive functioning in this vulnerable population.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: emotional behavioral problems
  • emotional intelligence
  • self-efficacy
  • learning disabilities
منابع
اقدسی، علی‌نقی و شکراله پور، لیلی (1402). مقایسه مهارت‌های اجتماعی، هوش هیجانی و افسردگی دانش‌آموزان با اختلال یادگیری و عادی در مدارس ابتدائی. نشریه علمی آموزش و ارزشیابی، (61)16، 145-164.
انصاری اردلی، سجاد؛ حاجی‌حسنی دره شوری، کرامت؛ حاجی‌حسنی دره شوری، پیمان و حاجی‌حسنی دره شوری، کامران (1400). بررسی اختلال‌های یادگیری و میزان شیوع آن در بین دانش‌آموزان. پیشرفت‌های نوین در روانشناسی، 34، 44-34.
بشری قمی، فاطمه؛ داستانی، محبوبه و سرکشیکیان، سید مهدی (1403). مدل ساختاری مشکلات رفتاری کودکان بر اساس سلامت روان مادران: نقش میانجی‌گری هوش هیجانی. مجله پرستاری کودکان، ۱۰ (۳): ۷۲-۸۲.
بیگدلی، ایمان الله؛ محمدی فر، محمدعلی، رضایی، علی محمد و  عبدالحسین زاده، عباس. (1395). اثر آموزش حل مسئله ریاضی با روش بازی بر توجه، حل مسئله و خودکارآمدی دانش‌آموزان مبتلا به اختلال یادگیری ریاضی، پژوهش در یادگیری آموزشگاهی و مجازی، (2)4، 41-52.
عاشوری، محمد و دلال زاده، فاطمه. (1397). اثربخشی بازی‌درمانی مبتنی بر مدل‌ شناختی رفتاری بر مشکلات رفتاری و مهارت‌های اجتماعی کودکان پیش‌دبستانی با اختلال نارسایی توجه-بیش‌فعالی. مجله توان‌بخشی، (2)19، 102-115.
العلیاوی، غفران (1400). نقش هوش هیجانی و تاب‌آوری در پیش‌بینی مشکلات رفتاری دانش‌آموزان دارای اختلال یادگیری. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه سمنان.
فاطمی نیا، محدثه سادات؛ حسنی، فریبا؛ برجعلی، احمد؛ و گلشنی، فاطمه. (1401). نقش میانجی هوش هیجانی در تبیین روابط علی بین نظریه ذهن و انعطاف‌پذیری شناختی با رگه‌های اختلال شخصیت مرزی در نوجوانان. فصلنامه علمی روش‌ها و مدل‌های روان‌شناختی. 13(50)، 150-135.
فرهادی کشکولی، باران؛ رفعت زاده، ما ظریف و اصغری، نادیا (1401). تأثیر ناتوانی در یادگیری بر خودکارآمدی تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان. ششمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی حقوق، روانشناسی، علوم تربیتی و رفتاری، تهران.
کوشا، مریم؛ نقی پور، سمیرا و فلاحی خشت مسجدی، مهناز (1400). رابطه هوش هیجانی با استرس فرزندپروری در مادران کودکان مبتلابه اختلال نقص توجه بیش‌فعالی. مجله علوم پزشکی گیلان، (2)30، 98-107.
گنجی، حمزه. (1385). هوش هیجانی مهارت‌ها و آزمون‌ها. تهران: انتشارات ساوالان.
گودینی، رحمان؛ پورمحمدرضای تجریشی، معصومه؛ طهماسبی، سیامک؛ بیگلریان، اکبر. (1396). تأثیر آموزش مدیریت هیجان به مادران بر مشکلات رفتاری فرزندان از دیدگاه والدین. مجله توان‌بخشی. ۱۸ (۱): ۱۳-۲۴
مظاهری تهرانی، فاطمه؛ قنبری، سعید؛ فتح‌آبادی، جلیل؛ شکری، امید و شریفی، مسعود (1401). ارائه مدلی کیفی از مشکلات هیجانی کودکان با اختلال یادگیری. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی تربیتی، (63)18، 83-113.
نوری زاده، مهسا (1401). رابطه خودکارآمدی با اضطراب اجتماعی دانش‌آموزان ابتدایی با اختلال یادگیری و نقش واسطه‌ای عزت‌نفس. هفتمین همایش ملی پژوهش‌های نوین در حوزه علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی ایران، تهران.
 
References
Ab Halim, F., Muda, W. H. N. W., & Izam, S. (2019). The relationship between employability skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities in vocational stream. Asian Journal of University Education15(3), 163-174.
Bar-On, R. (1997). BarOn emotional quotient inventory (Vol. 40). Multi-health systems.
Bar-On, R. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integral part of positive psychology. South African. Journal of Psychology, 40(1), 54-62. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/008124631004000106
Bishara, S., & Kaplan, S. (2022). Inhibitory control, self-efficacy, and mathematics achievements in students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(3), 868-887.
Bradbury, T., & Graves, J. (2005). Emotional intelligence (skills and tests). 
Chen, C. C., Cheng, S. L., Xu, Y., Rudasill, K., Senter, R., Zhang, F., ... & Adams, N. (2022). Transactions between problem behaviors and academic performance in early childhood. International journal of environmental research and public health19(15), 9583.
Cristofani, P., Di Lieto, M. C., Casalini, C., Pecini, C., Baroncini, M., Pessina, O., ... & Milone, A. (2023). Specific learning disabilities and emotional-behavioral difficulties: phenotypes and role of the cognitive profile. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(5), 1882.
Cumming, M. M., O’Brien, K. M., Brunsting, N. C., & Bettini, E. (2021). Special educators’ working conditions, self-efficacy, and practices use with students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 42(4), 220-234.
Dallasheh, W., & Zubeidat, I. (2023). Demographic, school-organisational and emotional characteristics of the absorption accompaniment process of novice teachers in Arab society in Israel. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(9), 1004-1026.
Donolato, E., Cardillo, R., Mammarella, I. C., & Melby‐Lervåg, M. (2022). Research Review: Language and specific learning disorders in children and their co‐occurrence with internalizing and externalizing problems: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry63(5), 507-518.
Fletcher, G., & Griffiths, M. (2020). Digital transformation during a lockdown. International journal of information management, 55, 102185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102185
Heiman, T., & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2020). Social-emotional profile of children with and without learning disabilities: The relationships with perceived loneliness, self-efficacy and well-being. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(20), 7358.
Kline, R. (2013). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In Applied quantitative analysis in education and the social sciences (pp. 171-207). Routledge.
Kouvava, S., Antonopoulou, K., Kokkinos, C. M., Ralli, A. M., & Maridaki-Kassotaki, K. (2022). Friendship quality, emotion understanding, and emotion regulation of children with and without attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder or specific learning disorder. Emotional and behavioural difficulties27(1), 3-19.
Laganière, C., Gaudreau, H., Pokhvisneva, I., Kenny, S., Bouvette-Turcot, A. A., Meaney, M., & Pennestri, M. H. (2022). Sleep terrors in early childhood and associated emotional–behavioral problems. Journal of clinical sleep medicine18(9), 2253-2260.
Mortan, R. A., Ripoll, P., Carvalho, C., & Bernal, M. C. (2014). Effects of emotional intelligence on entrepreneurial intention and self-efficacy. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 30(3), 97-104.
Price, S. E. (2023). Hearing the silent speak-an exploration into the silent spirituality of severely disabled children (Doctoral dissertation, Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO)).
Qu, G., Liu, H., Han, T., Zhang, H., Ma, S., Sun, L., ... & Sun, Y. (2024). Association between adverse childhood experiences and sleep quality, emotional and behavioral problems and academic achievement of children and adolescents. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry33(2), 527-538.
Raharjo, I. B., Ausat, A. M. A., Risdwiyanto, A., Gadzali, S. S., & Azzaakiyyah, H. K. (2023). Analysing the relationship between entrepreneurship education, self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial performance. Journal on Education, 5(4), 11566-11574.
Rutter, M., Cox, A., Tupling, C., Berger, M., & Yule, W. (1975). Attainment and adjustment in two geographical areas: I—the prevalence of psychiatric disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry126(6), 493-509.
Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological reports, 51(2), 663-671.‏
Zhi, R., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). The role of emotional intelligence and self-efficacy in EFL teachers’ technology adoption. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-12.