نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

2 دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

3 استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

4 استاد گروه روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

10.22054/jpe.2026.87279.2846

چکیده

هدف: هدف این پژوهش بررسی اثربخشی برنامه تلفیقی تعامل‌ والد کودک، آموزش به والدین و تاب‌آوری خانواده بر رفتارهای چالشی و پردازش‌های حسی کودکان دارای اختلال طیف اتیسم با عملکرد بالا بود. روش: این پژوهش کاربردی با روش نیمه‌آزمایشی از نوع پیش‌آزمون-پس‌آزمون بود. جامعه این پژوهش، کودکان اتیسم 5 تا 8 ساله، عملکرد بالا، دارای کلام و گفتار ساکن شهر تهران در سال 1403 بودند که به شیوه در دسترس انتخاب و به صورت تصادفی در هر گروه 15 نفر قرار داده شد. شرکت‌کنندگان پرسشنامه‌های رفتار چالش‌برانگیز (CCBS) نیمرخ حسی فرم مدرسه داون (1999) را برای پیش‌آزمون تکمیل کردند. سپس گروه آزمایش به همراه والدینشان 8 جلسه (یک ساعت کودک، نیم ساعت خانواده) برنامه را طی دو ماه دریافت کردند در حالی‌که گروه کنترل مداخله‌ای دریافت نکردند در پایان هر دو گروه مجدد پرسشنامه‌ها را به‌عنوان پس‌آزمون تکمیل کردند. یافته‌ها: داده‌ها از طریق تحلیل کوواریانس چندمتغیره انجام شد. میانگین نمره‌های کنترل رفتارهای چالشی در گروه آزمایش افزایش و میانگین مشکلات پردازش‌های حسی کاهش داشته است. نتیجه‌گیری: برنامه تلفیقی تعامل والد-کودک، آموزش به والدین و تاب‌آوری خانواده بر افزایش توانایی کنترل رفتارهای چالشی و کاهش مشکلات پردازش‌های حسی کودکان دارای اختلال اتیسم با عملکرد بالا مؤثر است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effectiveness of an Integrated Program of Parent-Child Interaction, Parent Training, and Family Resilience on Challenging Behaviors and Sensory Processing in Children with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder

نویسندگان [English]

  • Jalil Babapour 1
  • maryam shkoohirad 2
  • Mostafa Zarean 3
  • Majid Mahmoodalilou 4

1 Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

2 PhD Student, Department of Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.

4 Professor, Department of Psychology, psychology and educational science faculty. University of Tabriz - Tabriz – Iran.

چکیده [English]

Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated intervention program—comprising parent-child interaction, parent training, and family resilience—on challenging behaviors and sensory processing in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This research utilized a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test design with a control group. The statistical population included high-functioning children with ASD (aged 5 to 8 years) residing in Tehran in 2024, from which 30 participants were selected via convenience sampling and randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control group (n = 15 per group). For the pre-test, participants completed the Challenging Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ) and the Short Sensory Profile (Dunn, 1999). The experimental group and their parents participated in an 8-session program over two months, consisting of one hour for the child and 30 minutes for the family, while the control group received no intervention. Data analyzed through multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) revealed that the mean scores for challenging behavior control significantly increased in the experimental group, while sensory processing problems significantly decreased. In conclusion, the integrated program of parent-child interaction, parent education, and family resilience is an effective approach for enhancing behavioral regulation and mitigating sensory processing challenges in children with high-functioning autism.
Keywords: High-functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder; Challenging Behaviors; Sensory Processing, Parent-Child Interaction; Family Resilience.
 
 
 
Extended Abstract

Introduction

"Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is defined as a neurodevelopmental condition arising from dysregulation in brain development, characterized by deficits in social interaction alongside restrictive, repetitive, and inflexible behavioral patterns. These patterns often include rigid routines, rituals, intensely focused interests, sensory sensitivities, and motor stereotypies (Skoz et al., 2024). Recent evidence indicates a significant positive correlation between ASD severity, the emergence of challenging behaviors, and deficits in sensory processing integration (Costescu et al., 2024). Furthermore, sensory processing abilities exhibit high variability among individuals across the autism spectrum (Shearer et al., 2024). Imbalances in sensory processing can lead to secondary complications, including anxiety, depression, and compromised physical health, while sensory disintegration interferes with psycho-emotional development and shapes the broader ASD phenotype (Machado et al., 2024). Despite these challenges, autistic children often struggle to generalize skills learned in clinical settings to real-world environments. Moreover, the prolonged nature of recovery means that many families do not receive adequate psychological training regarding their child's rehabilitation or the continuous support needed to enhance family resilience. Consequently, the Integrated Parent-Child Interaction, Parent Education, and Family Resilience Program has been developed as a holistic child-and-family treatment approach. The present study, therefore, aims to investigate the effectiveness of this combined intervention on challenging behaviors and sensory processing in children with high-functioning ASD."
Research Question
The primary objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of an integrated program—combining parent-child interaction therapy, parent education, and family resilience—on challenging behaviors and sensory processing in children with high-functioning autism.

Methodology

The intervention program was developed using a systematic thematic analysis approach. To design the curriculum, an initial pool of 140 articles—published within the last five years in peer-reviewed, high-impact journals—focusing on parent-child interaction, parent education, and family resilience was reviewed. Following a rigorous screening process based on relevance and methodological quality, 73 articles were selected for thematic synthesis. The extracted data were categorized into two primary domains: child-centered and family-centered interventions, resulting in the identification of 12 sub-components.
To ensure the technical robustness of the program, its content validity was evaluated by a panel of experts and professors. The Content Validity Ratio (CVR) was assessed using a three-point scale, while the Content Validity Index (CVI) was measured on a four-point Likert scale. The analysis yielded a CVR of 0.91 and a CVI of 0.96, both of which exceed the minimum acceptable thresholds. These results confirm that the integrated treatment program, encompassing parent-child interaction, parent education, and family resilience, possesses high content validity and is professionally suitable for clinical application.
Research Design: This study was an applied research project employing a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test design with a control group.
Participants and Sampling: The target population consisted of children aged 5 to 8 years diagnosed with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder (ASD) by a psychiatrist, residing in Tehran in 2024 (1403 SH). Participants were recruited through an online call offering eight complimentary training sessions for high-functioning autistic children. From the pool of volunteers, 30 participants who met the inclusion criteria (including verbal communication skills and specific age range) were selected via convenience sampling and randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n = 15) or the control group (n = 15).
Procedure: Both groups underwent a pre-test assessment. The experimental group then participated in an integrated intervention program—combining parent-child interaction, parent education, and family resilience—consisting of eight sessions over a two-month period. During this interval, the control group received no intervention. Following the completion of the program, a post-test was administered to both groups to evaluate the changes.
Instruments: Data were collected using the Challenging Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ) and the Short Sensory Profile (SSP; Dunn, 1999).

Results

Table 1. Results of univariate analysis of covariance to investigate the effectiveness of the treatment program on research variables.




Variable


Sum of squares


Degree of freedom


Mean squares


F


Significance level


Effect size






Challenging behaviors


50/763


1


50/763


54/108


001/0>


83/0




Sensitivity


03/320


1


03/320


08/47


001/0>


67/0




Sensory avoidance


62/1123


1


62/1123


71/96


001/0>


81/0




Sensory sensitivity


05/446


1


05/446


73/69


001/0>


75/0




Sensory registration


27/902


1


27/902


79/117


001/0>


84/0




As presented in Table 4, the multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) revealed a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in the post-test phase regarding the mean scores of challenging behaviors and sensory processing subscales, including sensation seeking, sensory avoidance, sensory sensitivity, and sensory registration. An examination of the adjusted post-test means indicated that the experimental group demonstrated a significant improvement in challenging behavior control compared to the control group. Furthermore, children in the experimental group exhibited a significant reduction in sensory processing problems across all subscales relative to the control group. Consequently, these findings suggest that the integrated intervention program—incorporating parent-child interaction, parent education, and family resilience—is an effective approach for enhancing mothers' ability to manage challenging behaviors and mitigating sensory processing difficulties in children with high-functioning autism.

5. Discussion

In the current therapeutic landscape of Iran, families of children with autism often face a significant lack of comprehensive support, typically receiving only limited social welfare assistance. Furthermore, a substantial gap exists in clinical practice: parents are frequently excluded from the specifics of their child’s therapeutic sessions and often do not receive the specialized psychological training required to implement rehabilitation exercises at home. This lack of involvement hinders the generalization of learned skills from clinical settings to real-world environments. Additionally, while the child receives treatment, the psychological needs of the family—particularly the development of resilience—are often overlooked in continuous care models. Addressing these systemic gaps, the present study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated intervention program—combining parent-child interaction, parent training, and family resilience—on challenging behaviors and sensory processing in children with high-functioning autism.

Conclusion

The findings of this study demonstrate that integrated parent-child interaction significantly improves challenging behaviors in children with autism, aligning with recent evidence suggesting that parent-focused counseling is a robust strategy for behavioral reduction (Fatima et al., 2025). Regarding sensory processing, our results corroborate the work of Krupa-Kutara et al. (2023), who posited that enhancing parents' sensory cognition enables them to decode the underlying causes of their child's behaviors, thereby fostering a more supportive environment.
Furthermore, the effectiveness of the parent training component in our program is consistent with the seminal work of Scahill et al. (2016), which highlighted that because parents spend the most time with their children, their behavioral training is more effective in fostering adaptive skills. Similarly, Miller-Kuhaneck and Watling (2018) emphasized that family-centered coaching and training are highly effective for children with sensory integration challenges.
Finally, the role of family resilience in our intervention was pivotal. As noted by Sun and Hong (2024), while raising a child with autism presents immense challenges, professional support and increased resilience empower parents to create a nurturing family ecosystem. Moreover, the link between resilience and sensory processing observed in our study is supported by Rizk-Mohammad Abolanan (2024), who found that parental resilience is intrinsically tied to their specialized knowledge of autism. Collectively, these results suggest that addressing the family unit as a whole—rather than focusing solely on the child—creates a synergistic effect that improves both behavioral and sensory outcomes.
7.Acknowledgments
This article is derived from the first author’s PhD dissertation in Clinical Psychology at the University of Tabriz. The authors would like to thank the University of Tabriz for its support. This research was registered and approved by the Ethics Committee under the code: IR.TABRIZU.REC.1404.057.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • autism
  • challenging behaviors
  • sensory processing
منابع
سلیمانی، ح. بشاش، ل. (1393). اعتباریابی مقیاس رفتار چالش‌انگیز فرزند برای مادران با فرزند دارای نیازهای ویژه، فصلنامه روش‌ها و مدل‌های روان‌شناختی، 5(18)، 49-64. magiran.com/p1409225
شکوهی راد، م. (1402). اثربخشی درمان‌های بیومدیکال بر نشانه‌ها و رضایتمندی خانواده‌ها در اختلال طیف اُتیسم. روانشناسی افراد استثنایی، 13(51), 83-104. doi: 10.22054/jpe.2023.70389.2488
 
References
Al-Salihy, A. A. R. S. (2024). Longitudinal trends and correlation between autism spectrum disorder prevalence and sperm quality parameters (2000–2024): A comprehensive statistical analysis. Frontiers in Reproductive Health, 6, 1438049. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2024.1438049
Bourke-Taylor, H. M., Law, M., Howie, L., & Pallant, J. F. (2009). Development of the child's challenging behaviour scale (CCBS) for mothers of school aged children with disabilities. Child Care, Health and Development, 36(4), 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01055.x
Boyd, L. (2024). Sensory processing in autism. In The sensory accommodation framework for technology: Bridging sensory processing to social cognition (pp. 27–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48843-6_3
Brouche, S., Rigal, N., & Cazalis, F. (2024). Parental descriptions of sensory processing in autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 118, 102488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2024.102488
Burns, C. O., & Matson, J. L. (2017). An evaluation of the clinical application of the DSM-5 for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 17, 909–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2017.1351301
Camino-Alarcón, J., Robles-Bello, M. A., Valencia-Naranjo, N., & Sarhani-Robles, A. (2024). A systematic review of treatment for children with autism spectrum disorder: The sensory processing and sensory integration approach. Children, 11(10), 1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101222
Castada, J. A. D. (2021). Exploring the perceptions and impacts on fathers caring for a child with the diagnosis of autism (Doctoral dissertation). Northcentral University. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221089927
Chan, H. W., Hsu, L. S. J., & Shum, K. K. M. (2025). Exploring the human–animal interaction (HAI) for children with ASD across countries: A systematic review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-025-06745-8
Chen, K. L., Iao, L. S., & Wu, C. C. (2024). Impact of child behavior problems on parenting stress and depressive symptoms among mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder: Mediation of coping strategies. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 36(3), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-023-09919-3
Costescu, C., Adrian, R., & Carmen, D. (2024). Executive functions and emotion regulation in children with autism spectrum disorders. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 39(3), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2023.2215010
Daly, G., Jackson, J., & Lynch, H. (2022). Family life and autistic children with sensory processing differences: A qualitative evidence synthesis of occupational participation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 940478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.940478
Dean, E. E., Little, L., Tomchek, S., & Dunn, W. (2018). Sensory processing in the general population: Adaptability, resiliency, and challenging behavior. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(1), 7201195060p1–7201195060p8. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.019919
Dunn, W. (1999). The sensory profile: A contextual measure of children’s responses to sensory experiences in daily life. The Psychological Corporation.
Dunn, W. (2007). Supporting children to participate successfully in everyday life by using sensory processing knowledge. Infants and Young Children, 20(2), 84–101. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1097/01.IYC.0000264477.05076.5d
Fatima, S., Sajjad, M., Salman, F., & Sarfraz, S. (2025). Mental health outcomes in parents of children with autism: Implications for practice and policy. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 13(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2024.v12i4.2637
Greene, R., & Bartell, J. (2023). Resilience-enhancing skills for developmental transitions: Children with autism spectrum disorder. In Resilience enhancement in social work practice: Anti-oppressive social work skills and techniques (pp. 117–134). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2024.2429561
Grosvenor, L. P., Croen, L. A., Lynch, F. L., Marafino, B. J., Maye, M., Penfold, R. B., … Ames, J. L. (2024). Autism diagnosis among US children and adults, 2011–2022. JAMA Network Open, 7(10), e2442218. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42218
Harrold, A., Keating, K., Larkin, F., & Setti, A. (2024). The association between sensory processing and stress in the adult population: A systematic review. Applied Psychology: Health and WellBeing, 16(4), 2536–2566. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12554
Heyburn, K., Shaw, D., Carbert, K., & Thompson-Hodgetts, S. (2023). “Sensory in-service”: An exploratory evaluation of a group-based, caregiver intervention for children with sensory processing difficulties. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 43(2), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2022.2104151
Jeglum, S. R., Cicero, A., DeBrine, J., & Livingston, C. P. (2024). Emergency department utilization due to challenging behavior in children and adolescents diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Behavioral Sciences, 14(8), 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14080669
Kennedy, C. H., Huedo-Medina, T. B., Twachtman-Bassett, J., Kalsner, L., Areny-Joval, R., & Eigsti, I. M. (2024). Health condition comorbidities in children with autism and their association with challenging behavior. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 1–7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41252-024-00395-0
Krupa-Kotara, K., Kosiorz, M., Barylska, K., & Grajek, M. (2023). Sensory integration disorders in children with autism spectrum disorder—A review study. Applied Psychology Research, 2(1), 548. https://doi.org/10.59400/apr.v2i1.548
Kuenzel, E., & Duerden, E. G. (2024). Early adversity and family resilience factors in children with autism spectrum disorder: A narrative review. Neurodiversity, 2, 27546330241254222. https://doi.org/10.1177/27546330241254222
Lai, W. W., & Oei, T. P. S. (2014). Coping in parents and caregivers of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD): A review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1, 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-014-0021-x
Leijten, P., Melendez‐Torres, G. J., & Gardner, F. (2022). Research review: The most effective parenting program content for disruptive child behavior–a network meta-analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13483
Lerner, M. D., White, S. W., & McPartland, J. C. (2012). Mechanisms of change in psychosocial interventions for autism spectrum disorders. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.3/mlerner
Lobato-Ruiz, V., Romero-Ayuso, D., Toledano-González, A., & Triviño-Juárez, J. M. (2025). Quality of life and parental stress related to executive functioning, sensory processing, and activities of daily living in children and adolescents with neurodevelopmental disorders. PeerJ, 13, e19326. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19326
Machado, S., Paes, F., & Lima, J. L. (2025). Applied behavior analysis: Key points to improve autism treatment. Alpha Psychiatry, 26(2), 38858. https://doi.org/10.31083/AP38858
Martinez, A. R. (2024). Impact of virtual sensory integration training on parent and child outcomes (Doctoral dissertation). Nova Southeastern University.
Mestari, Z., Rivard, M., & Mello, C. (2024). Learning from educators: Implementation of a positive behavior support program targeting challenging behavior in children with autism. Evaluation and Program Planning, 107, 102491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102491
Miller-Kuhaneck, H., & Watling, R. (2018). Parental or teacher education and coaching to support function and participation of children and youth with sensory processing and sensory integration challenges: A systematic review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(1), 7201190030p1–7201190030p11. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2018.029017
Neufeld, J., Hederos Eriksson, L., Hammarsten, R., Lundin Remnelius, K., Tillmann, J., Isaksson, J., & Bölte, S. (2021). The impact of atypical sensory processing on adaptive functioning within and beyond autism: The role of familial factors. Autism, 25(8), 2341–2355. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211019852
Novek, C. E. (2024). Autism spectrum disorder: Proposal for a program designed to improve the quality of life in adults with autism. [Source information missing].
O’Neill, P., & Koudys, J. (2024). Scoping review: Caregiver training to reduce challenging behaviors displayed by children on the autism spectrum. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-00960-y
Octavia, A., Sitthisettapong, T., Kettaratad-Pruksapong, M., & Dewanto, I. (2025). Structured-visual model for dental examination in autism spectrum disorder children: Cooperation and compliance. International Dental Journal. [No DOI or volume/issue provided].
Rispoli, M., Lang, R., Neely, L., Camargo, S., Hutchins, N., Davenport, K., & Goodwyn, F. (2013). A comparison of within- and across-activity choices for reducing challenging behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-012-9164-y
Rizk Mohammed Abu-Elenen, N., Mohamed Ahmed, S., Khamis Kassem, F., & Mohamed Ali Hanfy, M. (2024). Impact of parental resilience on physical and psychological health among children with autism spectrum disorder. Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 15(4), 2093–2108. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhc.2024.429553
Rocha, N. L. L., & Salguero, P. S. (2025). Characteristics for the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. AG Salud, 3, 101. https://doi.org/10.62486/agsalud2025101
Scahill, L., Bearss, K., Lecavalier, L., Smith, T., Swiezy, N., Aman, M. G., … Johnson, C. (2016). Effect of parent training on adaptive behavior in children with autism spectrum disorder and disruptive behavior: Results of a randomized trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 55(7), 602–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2016.05.001
Scheerer, N. E., Curcin, K., Stojanoski, B., Anagnostou, E., Nicolson, R., Kelley, E., … Stevenson, R. A. (2021). Exploring sensory phenotypes in autism spectrum disorder. Molecular Autism, 12, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-021-00471-5
Schofield, D., Zeppel, M. J., Tanton, R., Veerman, J. L., Kelly, S. J., Passey, M. E., & Shrestha, R. N. (2019). Intellectual disability and autism: Socioeconomic impacts of informal caring, projected to 2030. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 215(5), 654–660. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.204
Schwartzman, J. (2020). Resilience training for parents of children with autism: Collateral parent and child outcomes (Doctoral dissertation). Palo Alto University. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04977-y
Shawler, P. M., & Sullivan, M. A. (2017). Parental stress, discipline strategies, and child behavior problems in families with young children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615610114
Skuse, D., Greaves-Lord, K., Rodrigues da Cunha, G., & Baird, G. (2024). Autism spectrum disorderhttps://doi.org/10.1037/0000392-004
Sun, T., & Heng, K. (2024). Raising children with autism spectrum disorder: Challenges and suggestions. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4881582
Szpernalowska, A., Matshaba, V. I., Mrugała, K., Choinka, M., Kalisiak, J., Mataczyńska, A., & Paprocki, M. (2024). Autism spectrum disorder: Latest advances in treatment. Quality in Sport, 22, 54744. https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2024.22.54744
Weir, P. (2021). The predictive influence of challenging behavior on parent stress in young children with autism spectrum disorder (Doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College. https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_theses.5458
Wright, P., Moseley, R., Tomasulo, D., Srinivasan, H., Wilson, J., Woods, S., & Rashid, T. (2024). Integrating positive psychology and autism: A roundtable. Autism in Adulthoodhttps://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2024.38246.pw
Zeidan, J., Fombonne, E., Scorah, J., Ibrahim, A., Durkin, M. S., Saxena, S., … Elsabbagh, M. (2022). Global prevalence of autism: A systematic review update. Autism Research, 15(5), 778–790. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2696
References [In Persian]
Soleimani, H., Bashash, L (2015). Validation of the child's challenging behavior scale (CCBS) for mothers with special needs children, Journal of Psychological Models and Methods, 5(18), 49-64. magiran.com/p1409225.
Shokoohi-Rad, M. (1402). The effectiveness of biomedical treatments on symptoms and family satisfaction in autism spectrum disorder. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 13(51), 83-104. doi: 10.22054/jpe.2023.70389.2488