شناسنامه علمی شماره

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد روانشناسی و آموزش کودکان استثنایی دانشگاه شیراز

2 استادیار بخش آموزش کودکان استثنایی، دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر، مقایسه ابعاد همدلی در دانش‌آموزان با و بدون کم‌توانی‌ذهنی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل کلیه دانش‌آموزان با و بدون کم‌توان‌ذهنی دوره ابتدایی شهر شیراز در سال تحصیلی 90-89 بود. نمونه پژوهش شامل 733 نفر از دانش‌آموزان 11- 7 ساله (383 پسر و 350 دختر) دوره‌ی ابتدایی شیراز بود که 339 نفر از آنها دارای کم‌توانی‌ذهنی و به صورت نمونه‌ در دسترس و 393 نفر بدون کم‌توانی‌ذهنی و به صورت تصادفی از مدارس ابتدایی شیراز انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش، پرسشنامه‌ همدلی گریفیت[1] (مارک دادز[2] و همکاران، 2008) بود که دارای سه بعد عاطفی، شناختی و کلی می‌باشد و توسط مادران دانش‌آموزان تکمیل شد. نتایج ضریب همبستگی پیرسون نشان داد که بین ابعاد همدلی (عاطفی، شناختی و کلی)، رابطه مثبت و معناداری به شرح زیر وجود داشت: 1) در بعد همدلی عاطفی، بین دانش‌آموزان (با و بدون کم‌توانی‌ذهنی) تفاوت معناداری وجود نداشت، اما در همدلی شناختی و همدلی کلی تفاوت بین این دو گروه در سطح 01/0معنادار بود. بدین صورت که دانش‌آموزان بدون کم‌توانی‌ذهنی در متغیرهای یاد شده بهتر از دانش‌آموزان با کم‌توانی‌ذهنی بودند.2) جنسیت در همدلی عاطفی در سطح 01/0 معنادار بود، یعنی دختران همدل‌تر از پسران بودند. در بعد همدلی شناختی چه در اثر اصلی و چه در تعامل بین دو گروه تفاوت معنی‌داری بین دختران و پسران وجود نداشت. سرانجام در همدلی کلی، در اثر اصلی، تفاوت بین دختران و پسران معنادار نبود اما در اثر تعاملی تفاوت در سطح 05/0 معنی‌دار بود. یعنی، دختران بدون کم‌توانی‌ذهنی همدل‌تر از پسران دارای کم‌توانی‌ذهنی بودند



[1]. Griffith Empathy Measure


[2]. Mark, Dadds

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Comparison between Empathy Dimensions in Two Groups of Students with and without Intellectual Disabilities

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zeinab Abedi Daryooni 1
  • La'ya Bashash 2

1

2

چکیده [English]

Various researches have consistently shown that
people with mental disabilities have difficulties in recognizing, describing
and responding to the emotional states of others. The aim of this research is
to compare empathy dimensions of two groups of students with and without
intellectual disabilities. The statistical population of this research consists
of all students with mild intellectual disability and typically developing
students of elementary schools of Shiraz in the academic year of 2010-2011. 733
students, 339 with mild intellectual disabilities and 393 normal students, aged
between 7 and 11 years old are selected as sample from elementary schools of
Shiraz. The instrument of the study is the Griffith Empathy Measure (Dadds
& et al, 2008). The scale has three dimensions; affectional, cognitive and
general. Parents of the sample students are asked to complete the questionnaire.
The reliability of the scale is studied by test-retest reliability (affectioal α=
.66, cognitive α= .57, and general α= .71). The validity is confirmed by
internal consistency. The study achieved the following results: 1) there is no
significant difference between the two groups in the affectional empathy
dimension. In contrast, results indicate significant difference in the
cognitive and general dimensions, because the typically developing students had
higher scores in the cognitive and general dimensions than students with
intellectual disabilities. 2) In the affectional dimension, females achieved
higher scores than males. 3) In the general empathy dimension, females without
disability had higher scores than males with intellectual disability

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • empathy
  • students with intellectual disability
  • typically developing students
Albireo, P.,Matric ardi, G.,Spentri, D. & Toso, D. (2009). “The assessment of empathy in adolescent: a contribution to the Itallian validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescents, 1-16.
American Association on Mental Retardation. (1983). Mental retardation: Definition, classification and systems of support (10th ed.).and Clinical Psychology, 68, 313–321.
Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R., C., Belmonte, M., K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: implications for explaining autism. Science 310, 819–823.
Baldry, A. C. (2004). "Bullying in school: A psycho-Social approach". Rome: Carlo Amore.
Bashash, L. & Sedagat, Z. (2010). A developmental analysis of the emotion recognition ability in mild intellectual disabled students. 19th World Congress of the International Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions.
Bohart, A.C., & Greenberg, L.S. (1997). Empathy reconsidered: New direction in Psychotherapy. Washington,  D. C.: American Psychological Association.
Brosgole, L., Gioia, J. V., & Zingmond, R. (1986). Facial-and postural-affect recognition in the mentally handicapped and normal young children. International Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 127-144.
Bryant, B.K. (1982). An index of empathy for children and adolescents . Child Development , 53, 413 – 425.
Clark, M. L., Ayers, M. (1993). Friendship expectations and friendship evaluations: reciprocity and gender effects. Youth Soc ,24,299 –313.
Dadds, M.R., Hunter, K., Hawes, D, Frost, A.D.J., Vassallo, SH., Bunn, P., Merz, S. & Masry, Y.E. (2008). A Measure of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Children Using Parent Ratings. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 39. 111-122.
Decety, J., & Lamm, P. L. (2009). Empathy versus personal distress: Recent evidnce from social neuroscience. In: Deceit, J., Ickes, W.(Eds.), The Social Neuroscience of Empathy. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachuseocial Neurtts, 199-213.
Dokmen, U. (2004). Sanatta ve gunluk yaşamda iletisim catismalari ve empathy. Sistem Yayıncılık, 363 s., Istanbul.
Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology(5th ed.): 3. Social, Emotional And Personality Development,  701–778.
Fabes, R. A., Eisenberg, N., Karbon, M., Troyer, D., & Switzer, G. (1994). The relations of children’s emotion regulation to their vicarious emotional responses and comforting behaviors. Child Development, 65, 1687–1693.
Fellman, E. S., Barden, R. C., Carlson, C. R., Rosenberg, L., & Masters, J. C. (1983). Children’s and adults recognition of spontaneous and posed emotional expressions in young children. Developmental Psychology, 19, 405-413.
Feshbach, N. D. (1978). "Studies of empathic behavior in children". In B . A. Maher (Ed.),Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 8 . New York : Academiv Press .
Feshbach, N. D. (1982). Sex differences in empathy and behavior in children. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The Development of Prosocial Behavior, 315-338. New York: Academic Press.
Feshbach, N. (1997). Empathy: The formative years, implications for clinical practice. In A.C.Bohart & L.S.Greenberg (Ed.), Empathy Reconsidered: New Directions in Psychology,33-59).Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Flavell, J. H. (1986). The development of children’s knowledge about the appearance-reality distinction. American Psychologist, 41,418-425.
Francoise, A., Marissiaux, T. H., & Grosbois, N. N. (2008) . Theory of Mind ‘‘emotion’’, developmental characteristics and social understanding in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Catholic University of Louvain, Faculty of Psychology, Chair Baron Fre`re in special education.
Hastings, R. P., Beck, A., Daley, D., & Hill, C. H. (2005). Symptoms of ADHD and their correlates in children with intellectual disabilities. Research in  Developmental Disabilities ,26 ,456–468.
Hogan, R. (1975). "Empathy: A conceptual and psychometric analysis". The Counseling Psychologist, 5(2), 14-18.
Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and Justice. Cambridge, UK: CambridgeUniversity Press.
Hunter, K. R. (2003). Affective empathy in children: Measurment and correlates. Griffith University, as partial requirement for the degree of philosophy.
Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press.
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). "Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying". Aggressive Behaviour, 32, 540-550.
Kassari, C., Freeman, S. F. N., & Bass, W. (2003). Empathy and responses to distress in children with Down syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44 (3), 424-431.
Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148–161.
Kuntsi, J., Eley, T. C., Taylor, A., Hughes, C., Asherson, P., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2004). Co-occurrence of ADHD and low IQ has genetic origins. American Journal of Medical Genetics, PartB, Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 124, 41-47.
Lopes, P. N., Salovey, P., Côté, S., & Beers, M. (2005). Emotion regulation ability and the quality of social interaction. Emotion, 5, 113–118.
McAlpine, C., Kendall, K. A., & Singh, N. N. (1991). "Recognition of facial expressions of emotion by persons with mental retardation". American Journal of Mental Retardation, 96(1), 29-36.
Malfa, G. L., Lassi, S., Bertelli, M., Albertini, G. ,& Dosen, A. (2009). Emotional development and adaptive abilities in adults with  intellectual disability. A correlation study between the Scheme of  Appraisal of Emotional Development (SAED) and Vineland Adaptive  Behavior Scale (VABS). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30 , 1406–1412.
Marton, I., Wiener, J., Rogers, M., Moore, C, & Tannock, R. (2009). Empathy and Social Perspective Taking in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Under Review.
Mehrabian, A. & Epstein, N. (1972). A Measure of Emotional Empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525-543.
Miville, M. L., Carlozzi, A. F. Gushue, G. V., Schara, S. L., & Ueda, M. (2006). Mental health counselor qualities for a diverse clientele: Linking empathy, universaldiverse orientation, and emotional intelligence. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 28, 151-165.
Nesdale, D., Griffith, J., Durkin, K., & Maass, A. (2005). Empathy, group norms, and children’s ethnic attitudes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26,623-637.
Otfinowski, G. A. I. (2000). Effects of empathy training on the peer approval of third graders. University of San Francisco.
Ozkan, Y., & Cifci, E. G. (2009). The effect of empathy level on peer bullying in schools. Humanity & Social Sciences Journal, 4, 1, 31-38.
Roberts, W. & Strayer, J. (1996). "Empathy, emotional expressiveness, and pro-social behavior". Child Development, 67, 449-470.
Rogers, C. R. (1957). Training individuals to engage in he therapeutic process. In C. R. Strother (Ed.), Psychology and Mental Health Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
Roth-Hanania, R., Busch-Rossnagel, N., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2000). Development of self and empathy in early infancy: Implications for atypical development. Infants and Young Children, 13 (1), 1-14.
Sams, D. P., & Truscott, S. (2004). "Empathy, exposure to community violence, and use of violence among urban, at-risk adolescents". Child and Youth Care Forum, 33, 33−50.
Shreffler, M. (2006). A program evaluation of community-based behavioral support program for individuals with mental retardation/developmental disability and challenging behaviors. Published in Proquest.united State University.
Schieman, S., & Van Gundy, K. (2000). The personal and social links between age and self-reported empathy. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63 (2), 152-174.
 Song, L. J., Huang, G. H., Peng, K. Z., Law, C. W., & Chen, Z. (2010). The differential effects    of general mental ability and emotional intelligence on academic performance and social interactions. Intelligence, 38, 137-143.           
 Spellings, M. (2007). The effect of empathy training on aggression in elementary age children".
Umberson, D., Chen, M. D., House, J. S., Hopkins, K. & Siaten, E. (1996). The effect of social relationships on psychological wellbeing: Are men and women really so different? American Sociological Review, 61, 837–857.
Watson, J. C. (2001). "Revisioning empathy: Theory, research, and practice". In D. Cain & J. Seeman (Eds.), Handbook of research and practice in humanisti psychotherapy, 445-472. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Zahn-Waxler, C. (1998 ). "From the enlightenment to the millenium: Changing conceptions of the moral sentiments". Developmental Psychology, 1−7.