نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه تربیت بدنی عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه شیراز (نویسنده مسئول)

2 دانشجوی دکتری رشد و یادگیری حرکتی دانشگاه علوم تحقیقات تهران

3 استادیار گروه آموزش کودکان استثنایی عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش تعیین اثر بازخورد تطبیقی- اجتماعی بر
اجرای تکلیف تولید نیرو در دختران با کم­توانی­ذهنی بود. روش پژوهش، آزمایشی با طرح
پیش­آزمون- پس­آزمون با گروه کنترل بود. از بین دانش­آموزان دختر با کم­توانی­ذهنی
شهرستان شیراز46 دانش­آموز دختر  به روش
نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. شرکت­کنندگان بر اساس آزمون بیشترین انقباض ارادی
که در نخستین جلسه به وسیله دینامومتر دستی از آن­ها به عمل آمد به دو گروه
آزمایشی 22 نفری در گروه بازخورد (هنجاری مثبت) و 24 نفری در گروه کنترل (بدون
دریافت بازخورد) تقسیم شدند. تحلیل کواریانس، عملکرد بهتر گروه آزمایشی را در
تکلیف تولید نیرو نسبت به گروه کنترل نشان داد. یافته­های این پژوهش شواهدی را
برای اهمیت نقش انگیزشی بازخورد فراهم می­آورد. بنابراین به علت تأثیر ویژه­ای که
بازخورد تطبیقی- اجتماعی بر عملکرد تکلیف تولید نیرو در دانش­آموزان با کم­توانی­ذهنی
دارد، به عنوان یک راهکار آموزشی مؤثر در زمینه آموزش مهارت­ها به مربیان دانش­آموزان
آموزش ویژه توصیه می­گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effectiveness of Social-Comparative Feedback on the Performance of Power Generation Task in Educable Mentally Retard Girls

نویسندگان [English]

  • robabeh rostami 1
  • mona rezaie 2
  • sosan jabari 3

چکیده [English]

The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of
social-comparative feedback on the performance of power generation task in
educable intellectual disability girls. Method: The present research is
an experimental study with pre-test and post-test with experimental and control
groups.
Among all elementary special schools in Shiraz
city, 46 mentally retarded girl students were selected through purposeful
sampling. The participants were divided into experimental and control groups
(22 inthe experimental group and 24 in the control group).
Results: Analysis of covariance showed that the
experimental group achieved significantly higher scores than the control group.
The results of this study provide evidence for the importance of motivational
feedback.Conclusion: Since the social-comparative feedback had a special
effect on the performance of power generation task in mentally retarded
individuals, it is recommended that this method be used as an effective
training strategy in the field of special education

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Power Generation Task
  • Social-Comparative Feedback
  • Mentally Retard.  
رابینسون، ان. ام؛ و رابینسون، اچ. بی. (1987). کودک عقب مانده ذهنی. (ترجمه­ی فرهاد ماهر. 1386). مشهد: آستان قدس رضوی.
اشمیت، ریچارد؛ و لی، تیموتی دی. (2005). یادگیری و کنترل حرکتی. (ترجمه­ی رسول حمایت­طلب و عبدالله قاسمی. 1387). تهران: چاپ اول، علم و حرکت.
Adams, J. (1971). A closed-loop theory for motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 11-150.
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.aamr.org/content_100.cfm?navID=21.
American association on mental retardation. (1997). Mental retardation: definition, classification, and systems of support (9ed). Washington DC. Author
Anshel, M.H. (2003). Sport Psychology: from Theory to Practice. (Fourth Edition). Scottsdale, Arizona: Benjamin Cummings.
Ávila, L. T. G; Chiviacowsky, S; Wulf, G; & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Positive social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercis,13(6), 849-853.
Bandura, A; & Jourden, F. J. (1991).Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 941–951.
Bennett-Gates D; & Zigler E. (1999). Effectance motivation and the performance of individuals with mental retardation. Personality Development in Individuals with Mental Retardation (eds E. Zigler & D. Bennett-Gates). 145-164. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Broussard, S. C; & Garrison, M. E. B. (2004). The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary-school-aged children. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 33, 106-120.
Bybee, J; & Zigler, E. (1998). Outer-directedness in individuals with and without mental retardation: A review. In J. Burack, R; Hodapp, & E. Zigler (Eds.), Handbook of mental retardation and development (pp. 434- 461). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chanias, A. K; Reid, G; & Hoover, M. L. (1998). Exercise effects on health-related physical fitness of individuals with an intellectual disability: A meta-analysis. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 119–140.
Cleaver, S; Hunter, D; & Ouellette-Kuntz, H. (2009). Physical mobility limitations in adults with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53, 93–105.
Deci, E. L; & Ryan, R. M. (1990). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 38, 237–288.
Deci, E. L; & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
Fernhall, B; & Pitetti, K. H. (2001). Limitations to physical work capacity in individuals with mental retardation. Clinical Exercise Physiology, 3, 176–185.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
Fox, K. R. (1988). The self-esteem complex and youth fitness. Quest, 40, 230-246.
Gallahue, D; & Ozmun, J. (2011). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults. (5thed). published by McGraw-Hill.
Gupta, S; Rao, B. K; & SD, K. (2011). Effect of strength and balance training in children with Down’s syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 25, 425–432.
Hall, J. M; & Thomas, M. J. (2008). Promoting physical activity and exercise in older adults with developmental disabilities. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 24, 64– 73.
Hutchinson, J. C; Sherman, T; Martinovic, N; &Tenenbaum, G. (2008).The effect of manipulated self-efficacy on perceived and sustained effort. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20, 457-472.
Ilies, R; & Judge, T. A. (2005). Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 453–467.
Jansen, D. E; Krol, B; Groothoff, J. W; & Post, D. (2004). People with intellectual disability and their health problems: A review of comparative studies. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research, 48, 93–102.
Lewis, C. L; & Fragala-Pinkham, M. A. (2005). Effects of aerobic conditioning and strength training on a child with Down syndrome: A case study. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 17, 30–36.
Lewthwaite, R; &Wulf, G. (2010a). Grand challenge for movement science and sport psychology: embracing the social-cognitive-affective-motor nature of motor behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 42.http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2010.00042.
Lewthwaite, R; & Wulf, G. (2010b). Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1, 1-12.
Lotan, M; Yalon-Chmovitz, S; & Weiss, P. L. (2010).Virtual reality as means to improve physical fitness of individuals at a severe level of intellectual and developmental disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 869–874.
McAuley, E; & Blissmer, B. (2000). Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 28, 85–88.
Middlekauff, H. R; Chiu, J; Hamilton, M. A; Fonarow, G. C; MacLellan, W. R., Hage, A., Moriguchi, J., & Patel, J. (2004). Muscle mechanoreceptor sensitivity in heart failure. American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 287, 1937–1943.
Pintrich P.R; & Schunk D.H. (2002). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications 2nd edn. Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Rimmer, J. H; Braddock, D; & Pitetti, K. H. (1996). Research on physical activity and disability: An emerging national priority. Medical and Science in Sports and Exercise, 28, 1366–1372.
Roberts, G. C. (2001). Advances in motivation in sport and exercise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Simons, J; Daly, D; Theodorou, F; Caron, C; Simons, J; & Andoniadou, E. (2008).Validity and reliability of the TGMD-2 in 7-10 year old Flemish children with intellectual disability. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 25, 71–82.
Smith, D.D. (2001). Introduction to special education: Teaching in an age of opportunity. (4thed).Needhan, MA: Allyn & Bakon.
Stipek D.J. (1997) Success in school – for a head start in life. In: Developmental Psychopathology: Perspectives on Adjustment, Risk, and Disorder (eds S.S. Luthar, J.A. Burack, D. Cicchetti & J.R. Weisz), pp. 75-92. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Taylor, I. M; & Ntoumanis, N. (2007).Teacher motivational strategies and student self-determination in physical education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 747-760.
Thomas, K. T; Lee, A; & Thomas, J. R. (2003).Physical Education Methods for Elementary Teachers. (Second Edition). Champaign, Il: Human Kinetics.
Thorndike, E. L. (1927). The law of effect. American Journal of Psychology, 39, 212-222.
Turner, L.A; Dofny, E.M; & Dutka, S. (1994). The effect of strategy and attribution training on strategy maintenance and transfer. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 445-454.
Vuijk, P. J; Hartman, E; Scherder, E; & Visscher, C. (2010). Motor performance of children with mild intellectual disability and borderline intellectual functioning. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 955–965.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (1994). Perceptions of self-determination and psychological empowerment of adolescents with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 29, 9–21.
Westendorp, M; Houwen, S; Hartman, E., & Visscher, C. (2011). Are gross motor skills and sports participation related in children with intellectual disabilities? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1147–1153.
Williams, K. J; Donovan, J. J; & Dodge, T. L. (2000). Self-regulation of performance: Goal establishment and goal revision processes in athletes. Human Performance, 13, 159–180.
Wulf, G; Chiviacowsky, S; & Lewthwaite, R. (2010).Normative feedback effects on learning a timing task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81, 425-431.
Wulf, G; Chiviacowsky, S; & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Altering mindset can enhance motor learning in older adults. Psychology & Aging, 27, 14-21.